The topic has been discussed many times. But today I would like to make you, or maybe some of you, aware of a few things.
First, arguing about the kidnapping makes no sense and is only divisive.
Secondly, we should always be ready for a kidnapping. Thus, no date should be set.
Third, what guarantee do you have that you will be raptured? I know many people who consider themselves believers, but with their lives they show one big destruction.
Fourth, there are some among the rapture analysts who support the theory that assumes a rapture after the Great Tribulation. You rely on 1-2 verses, mainly Paul's testifying that it will be just after.
Chciałbym przy tej okazji powiedzieć, że jest coś takiego jak prawda objawiona. Na czym to polega? Zanim wyjaśnię opisze na swoim przykładzie jak kiedys rozumiałem a raczej nie rozumiałem Biblii. Otóż z 20 lat temu próbowałem czytać apokalipsę. Było to dla mnie dramatyczne przeżycie, ponieważ nic z tego nie rozumiałem, czułem się bardzo źle, tak jakbym był gorszy, nie rozumiał czytanego tekstu. W pewnym momencie aby zredukować ten dysonans uznałem, że jest to daleko posunięta wyobraźnia autora czyli człowieka o imieniu Jan. Wyobraźnia niczym halucynacje co niektórych malarzy. Po latach wiem, że ja wcale nie chciałem poznac prawdy, tylko z ciekawości sięgnąłem po apokalipse, ponieważ na jednej z płyt Metalliki była mowa o 4 jeźdźcach. Bodajże „And justic for all”. Po latach także wiem, że to Duch Święty wprowadza w poznanie i prawdę i tu wszyscy się ze mną zgodzą.
The question now arises, who has the Holy Spirit in the matter of kidnapping? It's hard to judge, but I, when I choose material to compile or post videos, evaluate the person to see if the Holy Spirit can guide them
What then is revealed truth?
John 16
(13) And when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will be your guide on the way to the full truth. For he will not speak from himself, but will say what he hears, and will tell you what is to come.
John 43
(43) Why do you not receive my speech? Because you cannot listen to my word
The key verses are these:
John 14
"(16) And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another protector to be with you forever. (17) The spirit of truth, which The world cannot accept him, because it neither sees him nor knows him. And you know himbecause he lives and is in you. (18) I will not leave you orphans. I will return to you.
Not everyone understands the Bible well. This is a gift as the above verse indicates. Even if someone has the truth revealed by the Holy Spirit, it is not in all the verses.
The rapture before the Great Tribulation is not directly mentioned in the Bible, but it is the truth revealed to God's humble servants that points to it....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZwiGWnQ_LY
Note that the authors of the post-WU hijacking videos have no viewership in other topics. They are not filled with the Holy Spirit.
There is an argument against the rapture before the Great Tribulation saying that it has only been about 300 years since this theory existed. Unfortunately, it doesn't. That's first of all. No, because Ephrem the Syrian wrote about it in the first centuries. Second, the prophet Daniel clearly wrote that in the end times:
"Many will study it and cognition will increase""
And that's what's happening.
We already know who the harlot of the apocalypse is, but we're still not sure about the beast...
In summary, don't argue when there will be a kidnapping and ...DON'T SET YOUR SIGHTS ON BEING KIDNAPPED. BE SIMPLY READY all the time like virgins of prudence.
The early Christians were constantly ready and living as if it would happen then.
„Powstaje teraz pytanie, kto ma tego Ducha Świętego w kwestii porwania? ”
That's the basic question, and not just in terms of kidnapping, as many people as many opinions.
"...I, when I choose material to develop or post videos, evaluate the person to see if the Holy Spirit can guide them."
Rozumiem, że znasz te osoby osobiście, nie wiem, śledzisz ich w ich prywatnym życiu? Zdajesz sobie sprawę, że taka osoba może „grać” na filmiku, a w realu być całkiem inna?
Ile osób, tyle prawd. Rozumiem, że ci syjonistyczni protestanci z USA, którzy chcieli PRZYSPIESZYĆ PRZEBIEG PROROCTW BIBLIJNYCH, i wspierali finansowo Izrael, mają rację w porwaniu, gdyż przez nich głównie jest „lansowane”?
Na forum-chrzescijan.pl mnie spotkała niemiła sytuacja… „zaatakowałem” księgę Henocha, apokryf pozabiblijny, to Krzysztof (admin) od razu zaczął myśleć nad zablokowaniem tematu… Ani nie podważałem Biblii, a tu taka reakcja…
Na innym forum – protestant, który twierdzi, że „na nowo się narodził”… nazwał teorie o NWO „głupotami”, a sam uznaje predestynację i wieczne piekło dla potępieńców. On też ma Ducha?
Zielonoświątkowcy, którzy zwracają się w modłach do „Ducha Świętego” jako osoby, otrzymują różne dziwne reakcje – śmiechy, płacze, padanie, drgawki, bełkot zwany „darem języków”. Oni też mają Ducha?
Jedna osoba mi tam mówiła, że przed zbadaniem doktryny trzeba się pomodlić, tydzień postu, itd. – tak samo robił Ignatius Loyola i inni katolicy, którym nagle „objawiła się” jedyna, słuszna prawda.
Girion,
You are just very haughty. Shall I remind you how you almost forced me to put a link to your blog on my blog?
That's how you behave in discussions. Krzysiek treated you gently anyway. He is the gentlest man on the forum anyway
„Rozumiem, że znasz te osoby osobiście, nie wiem, śledzisz ich w ich prywatnym życiu? Zdajesz sobie sprawę, że taka osoba może „grać” na filmiku, a w realu być całkiem inna?”
Why the irony?
I don't know, but I sift through, I know a little bit about people, I know the Bible to some degree, I know behavior, etc. I combine facts. Above all, I examine the Fruits of the Spirit.
E.g. Dubis is a very humble man and he works a lot with his team on YT
„Na innym forum – protestant, który twierdzi, że „na nowo się narodził”… nazwał teorie o NWO „głupotami”, a sam uznaje predestynację i wieczne piekło dla potępieńców. On też ma Ducha?”
Let's introduce some logic. Who said he had a ghost?
Did I force the issue? Fact, I cared about promoting the blog, especially since I was acting, but you also benefited from my articles. Is there no such thing as help, cooperation?
Did he take it mildly? I simply stated my opinion with a Bible quote and a link to the article. Not allowed? Such a post should be followed by an honest discussion, not a threat to block discussion because of something... The Book of Henoch? As far as I know, one adheres to Sola Scriptura, meaning only the Bible, not additional books. Brain Breaker found Henoch to be true and knocked out the entire NT... Doesn't that make you think?
As for people. Fruits can be good, especially online, but also in real life, people like that can be humble but on the surface...I know some people too. I'm not judging Dubis or anyone, I'm speaking generally.
As for the Protestant - he himself. And many of his friends in the church.
I understand that this is your blog/forum, and you don't like someone writing the opposite, I've experienced that myself with me - sorry.
As you wrote as an argument that you would burn Fr. Hencoh, what other response could be expected.
„Rozumiem, że to jest Twój blog/forum, i nie lubisz, jak ktoś pisze coś przeciwnego, sam tego doświadczyłem u mnie – przepraszam.”
I don't want to search your statements Girion, but as I mentioned they are haughty and without love, without DS.
I have written many times comparing how someone writes with love and how someone writes without.
In your case, it's about form, not content. You are wrapping sentences badly.
As an argument that I would burn the book? Do a better search.
Just don't take it as a haughty answer.
Jak ktoś pisze parę razy to samo i nic nie czyta, to jaka ma być mowa? Pewnie jeszcze mam mu napisać „indywidualną” odpowiedź. Albo jak jakiś katolik przychodzi, i mówi, że „poza kościołem nie ma zbawienia, nawróćcie się heretycy”. Jak siedzę dłużej przy dyskusjach, to wiadomo że 'jakość’ wypowiedzi spada z powodu zmęczenia.
Sometimes you have to write with irony because otherwise it won't get to them. Maybe they'll discover that what they wrote is funny and eventually get it?
Girion! Maybe it's not a perfect testimony, but I'm with you there! Sometimes I even think that you could tighten some screws a bit more 🙂 but you'll get better... In my opinion I haven't read stupid texts by you yet. Your blog is valuable and I can confidently recommend it. You have your audience and keep it up!
Greetings
„zasem mi się nawet wydaje, ze mógłbyś mocniej niektóre śrubki dokręcać”
Angelika, you know very well that you are a blog troublemaker and such incitement is not Christian.
I write about peace, love, and the fruit of the Spirit, and you write to tighten the screws even more.
I think you probably need to change your blog....
I came here for the first time today, even though I should be at work (it's late and I have to finish a huge project by morning which I have just started), instead of working I have been reading for 2 hours... it seems that something attracted me here. Maybe the fact that lately I have been feeling more and more strongly that I have moved away from the right way of life. Thank you, Author, for your texts and your willingness to do what you do to save souls.
Girion - you are very strong in egoism, pride and intellectual superiority. Believe me, not everyone on the forum is a blind hen, not everyone is a donkey. There are people who belong to Mensa, and they have humility... Why do you have such a sense of superiority and willingness to prove to everyone that they draw wrong conclusions or use wrong expressions... why do you do it? Does Jesus guide you in kicking others out or maybe someone else? I wish you a proper examination of conscience with emphasis on the sin of pride.
Idealna nie jestem – ale Ciebie 'widzę’ ; 'czuję’. potrzebujesz nieco więcej ogłady, spokoju ducha i aby Duch Św. na Tobie spoczął
Girion, I just wanted to point out that you cannot treat people as totally deluded just because they have a different opinion than you on certain doctrines. I have conversations whether with Peter, Matthew, or others and despite our differences on certain matters it does not divide us, for we have a common foundation.
Arrivald.
I don't want to argue here somehow. But these are not minor issues [of little importance] that you can turn a blind eye to, unfortunately.
So do I, however my point is to judge someone in advance based on a differing opinion.
Example:
„bełkot zwany „darem języków”. Oni też mają Ducha?”
I have written about it many times, I have quoted the Bible, I myself give testimony about it (I used to not believe in it). Additionally, I have read books, asked people who e.g. prayed about it to God being given alone which excludes the transmission of an evil spirit (the Bible also confirms this). I also checked these people by their fruits etc. When I wrote to Peter, for example, I was always willing to explain what it was all about because I know both sides of the coin.
Don't get me wrong, I don't hold it against you or anything. You have your own opinion on the matter, that's fine, but in the quote I posted above you imply that I, for example, do not have the Spirit of God in a relatively mocking way.
„„bełkot zwany „darem języków”. ”
Well, that's what I'm talking about, but I didn't want to search. This testifies to not being born yet. Girion has knowledge, but he is not born again, because:
„Po tym poznają wszyscy, że jesteście moimi uczniami, jeżeli miłość mieć będziecie jedni do drugich”
Jeśli ktos np napisze: „porwanie przed WU jest nie realne”, a ja mu odpowiem „to jest stek bzdur i szmatlawe teorie” to czy ja okaze milosc memu rozmowcy?
Arraivald.
Read my statement to yourself again. Where do you see that I wrote about you?
ZIE-LO-NO-ŚWIĄ-T-KOWCY
You probably don't think that:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aKk16j-FVM
Is it OK?
I have nothing against you. Peace
„Pisałem o tym wiele razy, cytowałem Biblię”
And yet, you see... what can I say? I wrote about hell, about the trinity... and nothing gets through to you, I wrote a lot too, I quoted the Bible too. And you wrote the same stupidity, as if you can't read with understanding... sorry Can't you see that? And how am I supposed to feel? What am I doing with the rest of it...it's 12 at night and I'm sitting here having a discussion about nothing.
„Jeśli ktos np napisze: „porwanie przed WU jest nie realne”, a ja mu odpowiem „to jest stek bzdur i szmatlawe teorie””
it would be appropriate for you to explain this further.
Girion you also know of quotes that prove that hell exists and that the Holy Spirit is a person. I am with this option because I have also been interested in the subject matter and more indicates that however hell exists and that the Holy Spirit is a person. You know the arguments, you can choose mine or yours. I base mine additionally on testimonies of people who confirm what I believe.
Poza tym od razu to co piszę to: „głupoty, jakbyś nie umiał czytać ze zrozumieniem”. Cytowałem też Biblię i brałem rzeczy na logikę. I wierz mi, że orientuję się o co Ci chodzi, jednakże staram się nie obrażać Cię tylko pokazać Ci twój tok rozumowania, który uważam osobiście (nie tylko ja) za błędny.
Zdefiniuj „Zielonoświątkowiec”. Dla mnie to najczęściej protestant ochrzczony Duchem Św. który wierzy w Jego działanie w obecnych czasach. Jak tak zdefiniujesz osobę z tej denominacji to również się do niej zaliczam (chociaż nie mam zboru jak większość z tego bloga).
You mentioned languages in your comment and I referred to them as well.
My main point Girion is that you shouldn't treat people who have differing opinions backed up by argumentation in this way:
„i do cb nic nie dociera (…) ty pisałeś te same głupoty, jakbyś nie umiał czytać ze zrozumieniem… sorry Nie widzisz tego? I jak mam się czuć? Co ja z resztą robię…”
Regards and as I wrote, I have nothing against you, just pointing out some things.
„Girionie znasz też cytaty, które o tym świadczą, że piekło istnieje”
https://uderzwfalsz.wordpress.com/tag/pieklo/
" You know the argument, you can choose mine or yours. I base mine additionally on the testimonies of people who confirm what I believe."
Ja natomiast mojej argumentacji nigdy nie popieram świadectwami innych ludzi, tworzę „swoją” ewangelię. Jestem jak Charles T. Russel, zakładam swoją sektę i mam swoich świadków -;-
Na moim blogu pisze w komentarzach minimum 4 osoby, które jasno popierają poglądy wyrażane na blogu. Co ciekawe, jest taka jedna osoba, która popiera trójcę i odrzuca piekło? Częściowe zwiedzenie? Czy tylko „trochę” zwiedzenie, wg Ciebie?
Co do tego piekła, pisałeś, że „To Biblia ma być po naszej stronie, a nie my po stronie Biblii”. Tak Biblia jest po naszej stronie.
Podam ci linka do bloga protestanta (jak chcesz, to wyślę na maila), który wyznaje dokładnie to samo, co ty. Czyli: piekło, trójca, predestynacja. On nazwał teorie o NWO „głupotami”. Na blogu ma zdjęcia krzyży maltańskich, jakieś witraże katolickie z symbolami płodności. Jak słusznie mój brat w wierze (Daniel z forum) zauważył, to jest katolicyzm v.2.0.
„Mi głównie chodzi Girionie, żebyś nie traktował ludzi którzy mają odmienne zdanie poparte argumentacją w ten sposób”
And if the driving instructor is explaining to the student and he can't understand, after the sixth time he starts to get nervous, isn't it? More than once they start cursing.
Nie gadam, że „ten nie będzie zbawiony”, albo „heretycy do piekła”. Warunki zbawienia są chyba jasne:
https://uderzwfalsz.wordpress.com/2015/08/15/jak-dostapic-zbawienia/
Is the recognition that there is a hell or there isn't a hell binding? Clearly, no.
But we are to strive for maximum purity of doctrine, for purification from pagan and Catholic influences. So I propose a return to first century Christianity, not fourth.
I am not interested in another Protestant's blog Girion. There are different people and you can't lump everything together.
I understand what is written in Scripture directly, the lake of fire, the rich man and the rover, or:
„I odejdą ci na kaźń wieczną, sprawiedliwi zaś do życia wiecznego.”
- Matthew 25:46
Kaźń to kaźń, diabeł też będzie męczony dniem i nocą. A jest napisane, że ludzie trafia w to samo miejsce co on – jezioro ognia. Dla mnie to dosyć oczywiste i jak widzisz bazuję na Piśmie. Uważasz inaczej to twoja sprawa, ale nie zgadzam się żebyś twierdził, że to „głupoty”.
As for the return to 1st century Christianity, I wanted to point out that there were signs, wonders, speaking in tongues, healings, prophecies, and overall guidance by the Holy Spirit. This was lost when the CRC stepped in. Somehow I haven't come across you promoting this on the blog or sharing testimonies, quite the opposite.
The early church was not completely corrupt, the first doctrines they had were largely from normal Christians. It was only later that they began to add extra-biblical practices. Not everything in the NCC is bad. It's just that there is a lot mixed up. Just because Catholics acknowledge the Bible and Jesus does not mean that Jesus and the Bible are deceptions.
I prefer the standard teachings, given that one of the main promoters of such doctrines as soul sleep was Russel, who could not abide the idea of hell.
I also wanted to point out Girion that you are speaking from the perspective of a person who claims to be a teacher:
„A jak instruktor nauki jazdy tłumaczy uczniowi, a on nie może pojąć, to po 6 razie już mu zaczynają nerwy puszczać, co nie?”
I have told you many times:
„Niechaj niewielu z was zostaje nauczycielami, bracia moi, gdyż wiecie, że otrzymamy surowszy wyrok.”
- James 3:1
It is ok to share what you know or experiences/gospel. But we are to be careful about what position we put ourselves in and what we preach.
You have a knack for writing articles Girion, the more you should be careful what you write.
http://www.psnt.pl/Mt25w46.html
Not exactly an execution, there are different translations.
I don't know how you can believe in a psychopathic God who for rejecting his love keeps someone in eternal chains/weird state without him. This is not my merciful God of the Bible. pzdr
Execution? https://uderzwfalsz.wordpress.com/2015/08/13/manipulacja-w-przekladach-biblii-odnosnie-wiecznego-piekla-owlam-aion-i-aionios/
Po polsku jest kaźń, w oryginale jest „jednorazowa kara naprawcza”.
Lake of fire = death two.
Kubik wrote about the rich man and the rover, though it was Luke who wrote, read there, he explained it, material even before Paul's rejection.
Will the devil be tormented? https://uderzwfalsz.wordpress.com/2015/09/08/szatan-zostanie-doszczetnie-zniszczony-i-przestanie-istniec/
„zważywszy na to, że jednym z głównych promotorów takich doktryn jak sen duszy był Russel, który nie mógł się pogodzić z myślą o piekle”
OH PEOPLE... :/ MASSACRE. The promoter of the trinity doctrine was Emperor Constantine, and he supposedly did not convert, but worshipped the sun-god until his death.
Same logic. Stupid question, stupid answer. It doesn't fit in your head.
„Chciałem również zauważyć Girionie, że mówisz z perspektywy osoby, która ma się za nauczyciela”
Why are you telling me something I didn't say? I just gave an example that if someone doesn't understand something (or doesn't want to understand), and one explains it several (dozen) times, then, to put it mildly, something can break in a person, because a person is not made of steel.
And just like Lajcik wrote. Rejoice in heaven as your cousin, sister, or close family member will fry in hell.
But you do even worse - you acknowledge predestination, that God Himself chooses that e.g. Zdzislaw J. will be condemned and CAN do NOTHING about it, and then tortures him for eternity. This is KRK v.2.0 - we certainly don't have the same God.
To nie jest Bóg biblijny, to jest tyran, który nie uznaje wolnej woli. Jak się modlisz do niego? Mówisz tak: „Panie Jezus, przyjmuje Cię, przepraszam za grzechy, BO…… mam jakiś, ku*wa, inny wybór? Nie chce cierpieć wiecznych tortur, więc wybiorę Ciebie, choć w głębi Cię nienawidzę” – taka ma być logika? Jak napisał Lajcik: „Nie wiem jak możecie wierzyć w psychopatycznego Boga”.
Piekło i dusza nieśmiertelna nie pochodza do pierwszych chrześcijan, tylko od wyznawców Platona, który to wyznawał. Jego nauki przeniknęły pisma wczesnych chrześcijan, m.in. Tertuliana i Justyna Męczennika – i dlatego uważasz, że to było „od zawsze”. Polikarp, uczeń Jana Apostoła mówił, że dusza ludzka jest śmiertelna.
Doprawdy, nie rozumiem, jak można w to wierzyć. Ateiści się śmieją z takiego „boga”, może jakby poznali prawdę, to byśmy ich uratowali, eeee?
Arraiv., perhaps rethinking the issue of hell will somehow illuminate your view of other doctrines differently?
I know the argument. I believe what is written and what I infer. God is not human so he does not think like us and his justice is different than ours.
God is merciful, but also just and holy.
As it has developed, you can reach me on Skype Girion. You can always write to me : )
Whereas:
The topic of Greek and meanings I think needs deeper analysis.
I believe in predestination as far as the Bible goes and it is not as you described.
Temat piekła mnie nie kręci. Hasła „jak możesz wierzyć w tyranta itd.” nie robią na mnie wrażenia, ponieważ uważam, że im bardziej się poznaje Boga, tym bardziej rozumie się jego motywy i co to znaczy sprawiedliwość i świętość.
Taze was a proponent of this teaching from which other uncool things were born, I have concerns, it doesn't confirm the rule so in that respect I can concede you a point (you didn't have to massacre though).
I've written about teaching several times to you, it's about your general writing style.
There is no love from you...you are so far away from the other Lords you are arguing with...far away from them. very far away.
Girion and what kind of blog do you have?
how to find it and what is it about?
https://uderzwfalsz.wordpress.com
This is Girion's blog
Shalom!
The Lord God has already completed His team. Let us hope and pray to be on His life list.
Hmm, if someone is not kidnapped because he sins, then after the kidnapping he has no chance for eternal life?
everyone sins
we instead of focusing on the rapture of the antichrist when he is to come and who he might be whether it be obama or someone from another world who is not even human we don't really know but I do know one thing that we need to take care of our hearts and change for Jesus even if it doesn't work out
and not focus on things we can't wait to do because we live for Jesus instead of living for those things.
I wish Peter that this and other blogs would focus on spiritual transformation instead of these satanic mediocrities and future biblical events so it would be better for all believers 😀
Well, unfortunately, Przemek, I cannot fulfill your request. Many people are here because I help them understand political events in the context of the apocalypse
Przemek I think that you are somewhat right but not entirely. Of course we should focus on the things that build us up, I mean the Bible and the words of Jesus. But we also have a responsibility to live in the truth and spread it to the world like the prophets of old. I believe Jesus meant that we should be on guard at all times so that we can learn to live our lives according to God's will every day. Personally, we should treat the events on earth like the angels as a theater. We should observe it but also proclaim the truth about this performance so that the knowledge of the truth grows... So let us focus on the events of the world and more on the Bible in order to proclaim the truth and open the eyes of the blind. Just as our eyes have been opened. I hope you understand what I mean. And put an end to your disputes on this issue... Hey you are brothers and sisters after all 🙂 .
Polecam wykład autora Amazing Facts, który miał też świetny dokument o KRK pt. „REVELATION The Bride, The Beast and Babylon”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3hXKNTMuEY
who is the beast?
Nie każdy rozumie dobrze Biblię. To jest dar… Z pewnością są takie fragmenty, jak np. wspomniana Apokalipsa, ale Ewangelia (esencja) to poziom podstawówki. Czy Ktoś na tym blogu nie rozumie co mówi Chrystus, czego wymaga etc.? Wątpię… „Jednak nie z tego się cieszcie, że duchy się wam poddają, lecz cieszcie się, że wasze imiona zapisane są w niebie. W tej właśnie chwili Jezus rozradował się w Duchu Świętym i rzekł: Wysławiam Cię, Ojcze, Panie nieba i ziemi, że zakryłeś te rzeczy przed mądrymi i roztropnymi, a objawiłeś je PROSTACZKOM. Tak, Ojcze, gdyż takie było Twoje upodobanie.” (Ew. Łukasza 10:20-21) „I nie ma w żadnym innym zbawienia, gdyż nie dano ludziom pod niebem żadnego innego imienia, w którym moglibyśmy być zbawieni. Widząc odwagę Piotra i Jana, a dowiedziawszy się, że są oni ludźmi NIEUCZONYMI i PROSTYMI, dziwili się. Rozpoznawali w nich też towarzyszy Jezusa.” (Dzieje Apost. 4:12-13) „Ja zaś zaprawdę pełen jestem mocy Ducha Pańskiego, sprawiedliwości i męstwa, abym ogłaszał Jakubowi jego występki, grzech jego – Izraelowi. Słuchajcież tego, książęta domu Jakuba i wodzowie domu Izraela! Wy, którzy brzydzicie się sprawiedliwością i przekręcacie wszystko, co PROSTE.” (Ks. Micheasza 3:8-9). Śmieszą mnie ci wszyscy mistycy, prorocy itp., którzy mienią się wielkimi interpretatorami Pisma… No bo z czym się zmagacie każdego dnia? Z tym, że nie możecie pojąć, czy z tym, że jesteście za słabi, aby słowo przeradzać w czyn? … „Moją matką i moimi braćmi są ci, którzy słuchają słowa Bożego i wypełniają je.” Zauważcie, że Chrystus, mówi o „nierozumieniu” czy „niepojmowaniu” tylko w kontekście faryzeuszy, ślepych i głuchych na Słowo… „Stańcie się jak dzieci” – nie uczeni w piśmie… Jeśli można to proszę o więcej Ewangelii, a mniej o porwaniach, apokalipsach, NWO i wojnach.
Bravo, I sign my hands and feet.... thank you for this post
„Jeśli można to proszę o więcej Ewangelii, a mniej o porwaniach, apokalipsach, NWO i wojnach”
That is the profile of this blog and no reader will be able to set the blog author for themselves. This blog is me,. me is this blog.
Don't want to? Don't read. It's simple.
I devote a lot of time to this blog and I've been doing it for free for almost 3 years. So please spare me such requests with a dose of malice.
I've been eliminating the stress of this blog lately and I can see that it's a fine line.
Listen, there are a bunch of other blogs, books, and most of all the Bible.
No one has to be here by force, reading because they don't like something in the blog....
Po za tym, jest naisane na stronie „o blogu”, że nie jest to stricte biblijny blog” To oznacza, że zajmuje się także wszystkim co ma związek z siłami szatana, upodleniem ludzi etc.
Be consistent.
It is a choice. The Lord God gave us free will.
Someone who denies a blog or author and reads on is simply a HIPOCRAT TO THE QUADRATE.
You might want to put it up, because his episodes are very valuable, and who knows if anyone doesn't need it to know God. He explains it very thoroughly and bases it on the Bible. There are 12 episodes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KI4ORb9m468
PROJECT REALITY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KI4ORb9m468
Actually a very good lecture, so far I have only watched the first part and I am already looking forward to the next parts. I highly recommend it to everyone.
Thanks to Paula for the insert.
P.S. Piotr, in my opinion, it is worth putting these lectures in a separate topic.
May the Heavenly Father bless you in the work of evangelization.
ok, I'm putting it up even though I haven't watched it yet. You take the responsibility. I trust you 🙂 .
takie dobre słowa – „To normalne, że nie rozumiemy wszystkiego, co jest napisane w Biblii. Przecież napisał ją Bóg”.
http://www.moriel.org/online-sermons/76-sermons-in-polish/6512-the-future-history-of-the-church-1-polish.html
Jacob Prasch - has really good teachings, because he knows well the Jewish background of the time and doesn't like mainstream religions
You're right Peter, it doesn't matter when the kidnapping is, we should be alert and ready every day, but...
A while back I came across a video like this that made me realize that the rapture could be after the Tribulation. So far I was convinced that before, and that made me not so worried about even the mark of the beast to be rejected. And if the elect also come to face the WU, are we strong enough to survive it, to resist the evil.
I leave that to the judgment of the readers, each must decide for themselves. For me, the verses in Matthew say that the elect will also experience this time period.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sF5ccbL94Ko
There are 4 parts to this movie.
Who is the great harlot? I must have missed something. Greetings
Again, that a duplicate?
ok, it's already fixed to add comments, cheers
USA? Please give one answer
...
Roman Catholic Church.
According to other sites/blogs: Jewish bankers (redoctobermsz.wordpress.com), Sephardic Jews (yeshu.pl). Misinformation because in biblical language woman is symbolized by religion. The harlot/prostitute betrayed, meaning she had to be with God [Jesus] at some point, and the Jewish bankers had nothing to do with him from the beginning.
The way I see it.
„Dezinformacja, gdyż w języku biblijnym kobietę symbolizuje religia.”
In the Bible, woman or womanhood (when taken as a symbol) means a congregation (Israel), but also a city (quite a few examples in the ST).
Oh, and just so you don't think that the harlot is some unknown creation. The harlot and the beast are made up of the same people, or rather the descendants of those people. KRK = Gnostic founders (Tertullian, Origen) [Gnosticism = offshoot of the Jewish Kabbalah] + Jesuits [Jesuit founders were Jewish Kabbalists] + various secret orders [Templars = protoplast of today's Freemasonry], it is worth adding that Rothschild belonged to the Catholic Knights of Malta, a secret order serving the Pope.
Wychodzi więc na to, że po stronie nierządnicy są te same osoby [żydowscy kabaliści, sataniści], co po stronie „walczącej z kościołem”, czyli masoneria i illuminaci.
It is a Hegelian dialectic, designed to force the unsuspecting masses to support one side and make a big nativity scene.
Thank you for your honest answer:)