"Conversion" of Edomites IS equal to "Marrano / Crypto-Jew" because virtually no Jew would ever accept a trivialized / Romanized version of their religion imposed on them by the enemies of their people. Almost all conversions were done for practical purposes, not out of a genuine profession of faith.
Here we come to a turning point.
Mr. Loyola had a Jewish background.
"August 15, 1534. Ignatius of Loyola with six other companions (Francis Xavier, Alfonso Salmeron, Diego Laínez, Nicolás Bobadilla, Pierre Favre, Simão Rodrigues - all former students at the University of Paris) in the crypt of the Church of Saint Dionysius in Paris' Montmartre district - took their vows and founded the Society of Jesus. Six years later, the Jesuit rule was approved by the Pope. Of the six Jesuit "founding fathers," four (Salmeron, Laínez, Bobadilla, Rodriguesz) were certainly of Jewish origin, belonging to the so-called conversos. As far as Loyola's origins are concerned, there is strong reason to believe that his grandparents on the distaff side were Jewish, which, according to Jewish halakhic law, made him a full-fledged Jew. However, even if we assume that Loyola was not a Jew by blood, he was a spiritual Semite, characterized by a highly philo-Semitic attitude.
The period from the approval of the Order's rule until the first half of the 1670s was a time of growth for the Society and of gaining widespread influence in its crypto-Judaic formula, with a large percentage of conversos being accepted into the Society's ranks and placed in prominent positions. In this period, without much exaggeration, we can speak - by analogy to the Jewish communism - of Jewish-Jewishism. The breakthrough came in 1573 with the election of General Everard Mercurian, who began the operation of purging TJ of conversos, while a completely new policy was initiated around 1590 by Claudio Acquaviva, the next general of TJ, who introduced an absolute ban on accepting persons of Jewish origin into the Order's ranks. By way of digression it is worth adding at this point that Antoni Possevino, known from the Polish political scene, belonged to the conversos and as such he belonged to the faction firmly opposing the purges initiated by Mercurian."
http://www.racjonalista.pl/forum.php/s,759076
When Ignatius' family was faced with a "convert or die" or "convert to accept and win" moment, they told the Catholics what they wanted to hear. But they secretly maintained their Jewish identity and practices, as virtually all Jews do. So when Ignatius created the Jesuit order, he had in mind what all Jews had in mind: seeking refuge from persecutors and seeking change to end persecution.
Robert Malyks, a scholar who is associate director of the Institute for Advanced Jesuit Studies at Jesuit University, answered the question posed to him this way:
Q. Why was the Jesuit order so inclusive in its early days?
A. Ignatius of Loyola, the Basque who founded the Jesuit order in 1539, was joined by men who came largely from Iberia. It was a liberal order for the first three decades. Loyola was very open to accept candidates of Jewish ancestry into the order. He made sure there was no discrimination among candidates. One of the founding fathers was a converso. The Society of Jesus was substantially influenced by Christians of Jewish ancestry.
Translation:
”
P . Why was the Jesuit order so comprehensive in the beginning?
. Ignatius Loyola, a Basque who founded the Jesuit order in 1539, was joined by men who came largely from Iberia. It was a liberal order for the first three decades. Loyola was very open to accepting Jewish candidates into the order. He made sure that there was no discrimination among the candidates. One of the founding fathers was a conversationalist. For the Society of Jesus they had significant influence of Christians of Jewish origin."
Source:
boston.com/ae/books/articles/2010/05/22/g_force_of_jesuits_and_jewishness/
Do you remember this symbol?
Here is the religion of the Edomites: Isis, Horus, Seth.
Let's look at an excerpt from Professor Maryks book A Companion to Ignatius of Loyola...
From this passage we see that the "old Christians" (traditional Christians who were not converts) in the Church "suspected Loyola of crypto-Judaism" so much that at least one investigation was opened against him. Maryks also mentions "Ignatius' alleged Basque pride in his purity of blood". By the way, the " Alumbrados " (enlightened ones) of "Jewish origin", with which Ignatius had "numerous contacts", translates to "Illuminati". Lolyola was accused of having contacts with this group. Alum, luminati. You know what this is all about. Now after learning the truth it all becomes clearer who is behind the illuminati/Jesuits.
Alumbrados are the prototype Illuminati of the 15th century.
Alumbrado (Spanish: "Enlightened"), Italian Illuminato, plural Illuminati , a follower of the mystical movement in Spain In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Its adherents claimed that the human soul, having reached a certain degree of perfection, obtained a vision of the divine and established direct communication with The Holy Spirit. From this state the soul could neither advance nor retreat. Consequently, participation in the liturgy, good works, and observance of the external forms of religious life were unnecessary for those who had received the "light." The Alumbrados came primarily from among the reformed Franciscans and Jesuits, but their doctrines seem to have influenced all classes of people.
The familiar Masonic owl motif at the Alumbrados show in Colombia:
Now the 41st page of the book mentioned above:
This passage makes three important points...
1) He talks about Jewish infiltration civil institutions and ecclesiastical. The Catholics with their own hands will bring them to themselves just as the Maccabees did. The same error.
2) This confirms that the converts saw the clergy in the Church as a haven from persecution , although Prof. Maryks does not mention the other obvious motivation the converts had for becoming clergy: to end the persecution of their people by changing and even takeover of the Church Once they were inside.
3) Indicates that crypto-Jews have infiltrated other orders of the Church. Standard Jewish operating procedure is to infiltrate all factions within the institution to monitor their activities and take control if possible. But they didn't have to take over the Jesuit order because it was theirs from the very beginning. It was their hand in the Church.
The Law is essentially a synagogue of the Jews.
cdn.
Are there any true Judeans today? What religion do they practice? When someone says "I am a Jew", how can we tell if he is not an Edomite? How do we know if we have Edomite or Judean blood flowing in our veins because we had such ancestors, for example in the 16th century?
I don't know if there are any Judaeans today. There is a view that the House of Israel existed in Europe and that all the former kings in Poland and England were descendants of the House of David. Hence it is also said that the royal family in England is of this lineage. I personally find this to be an inconsistent view to say the least.
The Edomites study their genealogy through their mother's line, the Judeans through their father's. This is important.
The Edomites are placed in many offices together with the Khazars. They generally have everything under control.
Edomites were very quick to get visas to the US until the 1990s.
Could there be Jewish blood in our veins? Maybe, but I think we should know.
Reportedly, the true Judeans were monetized.
Generally there is nothing to fight against because everything is under their control.
You can only defend yourself and be vigilant.
Culture, business, offices, religions, everything is in their hands.
That is why it is so rewarding to know that we are not alone, that we have JESUS.
Have they - the Edomites gained influence in Asia e.g. China, India in Arab countries? When you say "they are everywhere" do you mean Europe and the Americas, or the whole World?
If you did some research on the Jesuits you would find that they invaded everywhere. Note that the Edomites, like the Jesuits, were expelled from almost every country.
What do you think of the theory that we Slavs are descended from the true Judeans? To me it seems highly likely, since all our kings were them?
I don't see the convergence of religions. The Slavs professed polytheism and worship of the same gods as the Romans.
Yes, there is a gap between the 1st century and the 5th > It is not known where the Slavs are from....It is said to be from the Indo-European countries. 500 years is not enough time for the Judeans to completely convert and forget YHWH.
Sooner than the Israelites, but also a similar problem although we have about 1000 years to change our faith....
I do, however, have it in my mind to start some exploration.
However, there are so-called Slavic Vedas, which are very similar to the Law of God:
http://detektywprawdy.blogspot.com/2013/02/wedy-slowianskie-zbiorem-praw.html
Text from an old blog where I was still crawling with these topics
It is very likely that the Slavs are descendants of the Arians. They came from Hyperborea, a more certain land; where the Arctic now lies.
AND any sources?
It is obvious that o2 or wp will not write about it. Much of history is falsified, as I'm sure you know. There are even many sources (yes I know they may not be 100% reliable, but always something) + sources from the Aryan-Slavic vedas:
https://www.rp.pl/Rzecz-o-historii/309099995-Hiperborea-czyli-skad-pochodza-Slowianie.html
https://www.google.pl/amp/s/www.odkrywamyzakryte.com/hiperborea/amp/
https://youtu.be/duAm1nM5erc
The Arians conquered the civilization that arose in the Indus Valley of India in 1500 BC. They adopted their beliefs (they combined their own with the native ones and so Hinduism was formed) and introduced a caste society.
Possibly. In any case, the Arians didn't come out of nowhere.
They are certainly descendants of Noah. ?
So the Judeans NEVER recognized descent from the mother and the Edomites began to recognize it?
(1) The genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. (2) Abraham was the father of Isaac; Isaac the father of Jacob; Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers; (3) And Judah was the father of Fares and Zara, whose mother was Tamar. Fares was the father of Ezron; Ezron the father of Aram; (4) Aram the father of Aminadab; Aminadab the father of Naasson; Naasson the father of Salmon; (5) Salmon the father of Booz, whose mother was Rachab. Booz was the father of Obed, and his mother was Ruth. Obed was the father of Jesse, (6) and Jesse was the father of King David. David was the father of Solomon, and his mother was /the former/ wife of Uriah. (7) Solomon was the father of Roboam; Roboam the father of Abiah; Abiah the father of Asa; (8) Asa the father of Jehoshaphat; Jehoshaphat the father of Joram; Joram the father of Oziah; (9) Oziah the father of Joatam; Joatam the father of Ahaz; Ahaz father of Hezekiah; (10) Hezekiah father of Manasses; Manasses father of Amos; Amos father of Josiah; (11) Josiah father of Jechoniah and his brothers during the Babylonian resettlement. (12) After the Babylonian resettlement, Jechoniah was the father of Salatiel; Salatiel the father of Zorobabel; (13) Zorobabel the father of Abiud; Abiud the father of Eliakim; Eliakim the father of Azor; (14) Azor the father of Sadok; Sadok the father of Achim; Achim the father of Eliud; (15) Eliud the father of Eleazar; Eleazar the father of Mattan; Mattan the father of Jacob; (16) Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, from whom Jesus, called the Christ, was born.
Well, that's exactly why I ask. Note that Jesus had no physical father and there is no doubt that he was recognized as a true Jew (Judean if you prefer). Thus, the Bible also sanctions descent from the mother and mentions Mary in Jesus' lineage as well. If they did not recognize descent from the mother as well, then they would not have recognized Him.
Do you know why Jews put the emphasis on the descent from the mother? Well, there is a principle "mater semper certa est" which means: the mother is always certain and if the mother is of Jewish origin, so is the child. Of course, the documented descent from a Jewish father is also recognized.
I don't understand the statement that the mother is certain. Is it the father who is not sure?
From the movie Stolen Children of Spain, it seems that the mother can't be sure either if you take "coincidences" into account.
In Israel the father has always been important because there was patriarchy and in the Edomites there was matriarchy and who knows if today's
Italians are not primarily Edomites with their mama mia.
In the genealogy I have quoted intentionally, these three women are inserted episodically I presume to show these biblical characters highlighted in the books. The genealogy goes mainly down the male line.
1 Chronicles to Abraham:
"(1) Adam, Seth, Enoch, (2) Kenan, Mahalaleel, Jered, (3) Henoch, Methuselah, Lamek, (4) Noah, Shem, Cham, and Japheth. (5) Japheth's sons Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech, and Tiras. (6) The sons of Gomer: Ashkanaz, Rifat, and Togarma. (7) The sons of Javan: Elisha and Tarshish, Kittim and Dodanim. (8) The sons of Cham: Kush, Misraim, Put, and Canaan. (9) The sons of Kush: Seba, Chawila, Sabta, Rama, and Sabteka. The sons of Rama: Saba and Dedan. (10) Kush [still] was the father of Nimrod, who was the first mighty man on earth. (11) Misraim was the father of the Ludites, Anamites, Lehabites, Naphtaliites, (12) Patrusites, Kasluchites, and Kaftorites, from whom the Philistines came forth. (13) And Canaan was the father of Sidon his firstborn, then of Chet, (14) and of the Jebusites, Amorites, Girgashites, (15) Chivites, Arkites, Synites, (16) Arvadites, Semarites, and Chamathites. (17) The sons of Shem: Elam, Ashshur, Arpakhshad, Lud, and Aram. [The sons of Aram]: Us, Chul, Geter, and Meshek. (18) Arpakhshad was the father of Shelah, and Shelah was the father of Eber. (19) Two sons were born to Eber: the name of one was Peleg, for in his days the land was divided, and the name of his brother was Joktan. (20) Joktan was the father of Almodad, Shelef, Khasarmawet, Jerach, (21) Hadoram, Uzal, Dikla, (22) Ebal, Abimael, Sheba, (23) Ofir, Chawila, and Jobab. All these were the sons of Joktan. (24) Sem, Arpakhshad, Shelah, (25) Eber, Peleg, Reu, (26) Serug, Nachor, Terach, (27) Abram, that is, Abraham. (28) Abraham's sons Isaac and Ishmael."
same thing, mostly fathers.
Note also that Polina the Edomite state strives for matrairchat. 500 plus is the motivation for women's independence from their husbands. The Mother of God, parity in the parliament, etc. etc...
Jesus had no physical father because He Himself is the Father. ?
The mother is always certain - the point is that we are always (or almost always) certain who the mother of a child is. If we assume that only the father is acknowledged, this criterion is not so certain, because the mother may lie and the father may in fact be a foreigner.
As I understand it, the Edomites follow Judaism (now rabbinic). What makes you conclude that this religion promotes matriarchy?
It is common knowledge that the current Jews run the banks, schools, institutions and culture.
So the laws they create and this culture of socialism where women are supposed to go on tractors. Now I'm not going to elaborate on the sexual revolution that they're behind.
It is known that Mr. and Mrs. Lubavitch have both influence on the president of Poland and the United States.
I've seemingly already associated that they had and still have a lot of influence (both among Jesuits and in general...), but I didn't know those tentacles were so extensive 😮
(thanks also to the other commenters and the admin for another batch of new news)