The Catholic eucharist is a symbol of cannibalism.

Over such texts descends, unfortunately....

 

 

The Eucharist is the basic teaching of Catholicism and its main biblical support is John 6 : 53, which correctly reads thus:

 

"And Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, unless ye eat the fleshly nature of the Son of man, and drink his shed blood ye have no life in you."

 

Jesus as a lawgiver could NEVER urge the drinking of wine as actual blood because he would be contradicting his own Law:

 

 

"Whoever eats any blood will be excluded from among his people. " Kpl 7.27

 

 

He would have to violate the Leviticus Law.

Now I understand more the point of the Vatican creating the SJ sect. It's their horse, so anyone who doesn't want to eat blood, for example in blood pudding, is a sectarian. A very clever manoeuvre.

 

In Leviticus 17 we also have this prohibition, but the Roman church considers this to be Judaism just like celebrating the Sabbath. Besides, along with their traitor pastors.

 

 

If anyone from the house of Israel or from among the sojourners who have settled among them shall eat any blood, I will turn my face against that man who eats blood, and I will exclude him from among his people. 

 

This law applied to newcomers as well and has never changed, for in the blood is the soul:

 

" If anyone of the Israelites or of the sojourners who have settled among you hunts an edible animal, beast or bird, he shall let out its blood and cover it with earth. (14) For the life of all flesh is in his blood - Therefore I have given a commandment to the children of Israel: you shall not eat the blood of any flesh, For the life of all flesh is in his blood. Whoever consumes it will be turned off. (15) Any native or newcomer, who eats the flesh of a fallen or torn animal, will wash his clothes, bathe in water, and be unclean until evening. Then he will regain his purity. (16) If he does not wash his clothes and bathe his body, he will incur guilt. "

 

The soul did not come out of the blood with the resurrection of Jesus!

 

 

Since in John 7: 1 the Jews were trying to kill Jesus , so what better way to put the death penalty on Jesus?

Obviously by using his own words against them. This was evident in Luke chapter 11 when Jesus admonished the experts in the law. Today we would say religious legalists. £e....

They used their verbal skills to trap him and waited for those words from Jesus that would condemn him.

 

What Jesus said, with witnesses present, in John 6:53 would have been sufficient to prove him blasphemous and make him worthy of death.

 

"And Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, unless ye eat the fleshly nature of the Son of man, and drink his shed blood ye have no life in you."

 

 

Furthermore, in John 10:33

 

 And the Jews answered him, saying, We stone thee not for a good deed, but for blasphemy, and because thou, being a man, makest thyself God.

 

The legal basis was:

(You shall have no other gods before me, Exodus 21: 3); and because you, being a man, give yourself to God. In this verse the Jews accuse Jesus of blasphemy, but they do not look to the Law these scribes and Pharisees what is said in John 6:53, which Rome makes itself the basis for eating Jesus. Why? Because of John 6:63:

 

" The spirit is animating, the inner body doesn't help; the words that I speak unto you, they are the Spirit, and they are life"

 

The flesh helps nothing! John 6:63 refutes the Catholic view of John 6.53. hope you understand what I wrote.

Furthermore, in several translations this John 6.53 e.g. in the Silesian TB reads as I wrote:

 

And Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, if ye eat not of a carnal nature Son of Man and you do not drink his shed blood you have no life in you.

 

 

So the average Catholic will ask: then what did Jesus mean by eating his flesh? This is explained by the same John 6:

 

"Contend not for the food that perisheth, but for the food that endureth, the food of eternal life, which the Son of man shall give you: for upon him hath God the Father set his seal."

 

That food is the Word of God - the Bible. Not the teachings of a Pope who mixes Islam with Christianity, who covers for pedophiles, who is a Jesuit, but the BIBLE.

 

Catholics devour Christ - as symbol real satanic rituals. They eat flesh and blood and still believe in it. What cannibalism and credulity to a religious system and this is done by very educated people.

 

 

Here's another explanation in more detail that I found online:

 

——————–

 

In the Gospel John 1: 1 is written:

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and  The Word was God “.

Also in John 1:14   "A The Word became flesh and dwelt among us (and we beheld His glory, the glory of the only begotten of the Father) full of grace and truth."

 

You see, Jesus Christ tells us that we must be filled In a word God. Not some spell and sorcery promoting mental cannibalism in the Catholic Church (with all due respect).

 

Jesus is the true manna (6: 27-34)

Jesus is the Bread of Life (6:35-51)

 

 

In verses 27-29 Jesus establishes two things concerning salvation:

• The Son of Man (the title Jesus uses to refer to himself) will give you food that will sustain you not only for a few hours, but also in the life to come (eternal life). It is the bread that gives life after death.
• We cannot earn eternal life, we receive it by believing in Jesus.

He then pivots the discussion of manna from heaven to focus on the eternal life it offers them:

 

"... it is my Father who gives you the true bread from heaven, for the bread of God is He who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world." (John 6: 32b-33)

Jesus' listeners respond: "Lord, from now on give us this bread" (6:34), similar to the response of the woman at the Well in Samaria: "Please give me this water so that I will not be thirsty and have to come here to draw water "(John 4:15).

 

Did the Samaritan woman eat Jesus at that time? No. She got to know Him. His absolute spiritual beauty, His love. Maybe I will make a film about it. Too bad that day has only 24 hours :-).

 

2 Jesus, the Bread of Life (6: 35-51)

 

Now Jesus begins the first out of seven "I AM" passages in John (6:35, 8:12, 10: 9, 10:11, 11:25, 14: 6, 15: 1). "I am" is obviously an unveiled reference to the name by which God revealed Himself to Moses as Yahweh - "I AM WHO I AM" (Exodus 3:14).

” ³⁵ Then Jesus said," I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to Me will not hunger; and whoever believes in Me will never thirst. ³⁶ But as I said, you have seen me and yet do not believe... "(John 6: 35-36)

 

There are some sects of Arians, SJ that reject Jesus as God, but with a deeper study of the Scriptures it cannot be understood otherwise. Look at the seven, I am , manna as with the Israelites from God....

Jesus is God.

 

In what way is Jesus like bread? His followers will never go hungry or thirsty. He is obviously speaking spiritually here, not physically, in keeping with the tradition of Isaiah 49:10 and 55: 1-2. Jesus used similar language with the woman at the well in Samaria:

"Everyone who drinks of this water will thirst again, but whoever drinks of the water I give him will never thirst. Indeed, the water that I will give him will become in him a spring of water flowing out to eternal life." (John 4: 13-14)

 

 

In John 6: 35-51 Jesus teaches that:

• Faith in Him now leads to having eternal life! (6:47)
• Jesus is the Bread of Life who, using the analogy of manna, came down from heaven. (6:51)
• The Bread of Life brings eternal life to those who eat it. (6: 50-51a)

So what does the metaphorical language of "eating" the "Bread of Life" mean? Put verses 47 and 51a side by side and you will clearly notice:

 

 

 

It is quite clear that "believing in Jesus" corresponds to "eating the Bread of Life" because they are used as parallel statements in the same context and with the same result -. eternal life.

If I were still Catholic it would probably be a difficult speech. But now I know that Jesus gives me life after I die. We will all die, but we will not all live forever.

 

This theme weaves through this discourse and is mentioned for the first time in the entire passage (6: 39-40, 47, 57, 63, etc.).

The Catholic Saint Augustine put it this way: "To believe in Him is to eat living bread, and he who believes, eating, is satiated with invisibility."

 

 

 

The body offered for the life of the world (6: 51b).

 

Jesus now moves from the analogy of the Bread of Life to a new analogy: the sacrifice of His body on the cross. Here is the transition verse:

 

"This bread is my body, which I will give for the life of the world." (John 6: 51b)

 

We have seen these words before in chapters 1 and 4, but not in this way:

 

"body"	sarx	"the body, the physical body." 2
"give, considering"	didōmi	"to devote to some purpose or cause; to give up; to sacrifice." 3
"for"	Huper	"on behalf of, for the benefit of someone or something". 4

 

The purpose of Jesus' gift of his body is "the soul of the world," that is, eternal life, a theme Jesus keeps returning to in this passage. Now compare this verse in the Gospel of John with the words:

Luke

 

 

Luke 22:19b	Then he took bread And having given thanks, he broke it, and gave it to them, saying, This is	my body ( sōma )	given	for	you...
John 6: 51b	This bread is	my body ( sarx )	which I'll give	for	life of the world.

 

 

It is quite clear to me that Jesus has the same thought in mind, even though these words were given at different times. Jesus' teaching about the Bread of Life serves as a kind of parallel teaching for the institution and company that is the Roman church.

 

 

3 Participation in the Son of Man (6: 52-59)

 

The Jesus metaphor has now shifted from eating bread to eating meat. Any reasonable person as well as Torah followers, Judaists react with disgust to the cannibalistic view of the bread of life:

 

” ⁵² Then the Jews disputed among themselves, saying: How can the One give us His body to eat? (53) And Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. (54) Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. (55) For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. (56) Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood lives in me, and I in him. (57) As the Father sent me who lives, and I live through the Father, so he who eats me will live through me. (58) Such is the bread which came down from heaven, not such as the fathers ate and died; he who eats of this bread shall live for ever. (59) This is what he said when he taught in the synagogue in Capernaum . " (John 6: 52-59)

 

 

The listeners take his words literally and are deeply offended, as Jesus undoubtedly knew. However, it seems that Jesus is intentionally stretching the statement even further, so that if it is to be taken literally, it becomes even more offensive. Although some believe he is speaking literally about his body and blood in the Eucharist, I see this as an example of Jesus using hyperbole to make his point strong and memorable (Matthew 5: 29-30, 19:24; 6: 41-42, 14:26, 1 Corinthians 9:27).

We all learn about stylistic devices in school, but here it has been made into a belief in actually eating Jesus' body. As if Johnny during the eucharist was eating Jesus' foot and Mary standing next to him was eating his liver... Absurd and nightmarish. Total deception.

 

Arguments for a literal understanding of the Eucharist

 

 

Let us examine the arguments for a literal application of this passage about the Eucharistic body of Jesus. Nineteenth Century German Catholic theologian, Joseph Pohle, said:

"Nothing prevents interpreting the first part (6: 26-48) metaphorically and understanding by" bread from heaven "Christ Himself as the object of faith to be received figuratively as spiritual food through the mouth of faith. Such a symbolic explanation of the second part of the discourse (6: 52-72), however, is not only unusual but absolutely impossible. "

Pohle's argument of impossibility, confirmed by Catholic New Testament scholar Raymond E. Brown, ^, is that the metaphor of "eating enemies" is used with the metaphor of food (Psalm 14: 4; 27: 2; 53: 4: Zechariah 9: 9) and drinking blood was forbidden by God's law (Genesis 9: 4, Leviticus 3:17, Deuteronomy 12:23, Acts ), so his words cannot have a favorable meaning, unless They refer to the Eucharist. However, it is clear to me that we don't have to go as far as the Old Testament does from the metaphor, just a few verses back when it talks about eating the Bread of Life (6: 50-51a). This is a continuation and intensification of the same metaphor.

On the other hand, Jesus clearly meant that part of the discourse preceding that which was accepted figures in the Bread of Life. To take one part of the discourse figuratively and literally would be very strange, especially since Jesus sums it up in verse 58 by referring to the previous words about the Bread of Life:

 

"This is the bread that came down from heaven, and your forefathers ate manna and died, but he who feeds on this bread will live forever." (6:58)

What does Jesus think about eating His Body, drinking His Blood?

If this is figurative language, as I believe it is, then what is Jesus saying? Observe in 6: 53-59 the consequences of eating Jesus' flesh and drinking his blood. Let's look at these one by one:

 

 

Reference	Effect	Similar sayings elsewhere
6:53	To have life in you	The consequence of faith is to have life in His name, according to John 20:31. In 1 John 5: 10-12, life has to do with faith in the Son of God.
6: 54a	He has eternal life	Eternal life is the consequence of faith in John 6: 40a, and also in John 3: 15-16; 3:36; 5:24; 1 Timothy 1:16; 1 John 5:13; etc.
6: 54b	Resurrection of the last day	The resurrection on the last day is a consequence of faith according to John 6: 40b. Jesus also links faith in him with resurrection and eternal life in raising Lazarus (John 11: 25-26)
6:56	Remains or abides in Jesus	It is also a consequence of believing the words of Jesus according to John 15: 7. His word remaining in us or abiding in us is related to eternal life (1 John 2: 23-25), being true disciples (John 8: 31-32) and bearing fruit (John 15: 5).
6:57	Live through me	The consequence of believing the passage "I am the resurrection and the life", John 11: 25-26
6:58	To live forever	"Living forever" is the implication of eating the "living bread" in John 6: 51b above. This is another way of saying that he "has eternal life" (see 6:54a above). In John 11:26, Jesus links faith in Him with eternal death.

 

 

It is quite clear that the consequences of committing one's faith to Jesus - faith in Jesus - are the same as "eating His Body and drinking His Blood." It is a strong, even extreme faith metaphor. As FF Bruce put it: "To believe in Christ is not only to give credence to what he says, but also to unite with him by faith, to participate in his life."

 

4 Responses to Teaching (6: 60-71)

 

The metaphor was so vivid, so extreme, that it caused an uproar. Many "disciples" left and did not follow Jesus again. Here is an example of the mysteries of the Kingdom given in parables to reveal the truth to true disciples and hide it from those who follow the crowds (Mark 4:11-12).

In this passage also Peter proclaimed the faith of the Twelve, "Lord, to whom we will go, you have the words of eternal life; we believe and know that you are Saints of God" (John 6:68). -69). It is striking to me that this disapproval of many of the disciples is an illustration of Jesus' teaching on faith:

 

"To the Jews who believed him, Jesus said," If you hold to my teaching, you truly are my disciples, then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free "(John 8: 31-32). )

 

 

There are some "hard words" in life that cause a weak heart to let go. There are those who assent to Jesus' words, but when there is a crisis of faith, those who continue to feed to Jesus, who continue to believe, who abide in him, are his true disciples; the rest fall away. This whole passage speaks of Jesus having "words of eternal life," words that, when we believe, lead to eternal life.

 

The spirit gives life, the flesh counts for nothing (6:63)

 

 

Jesus continues:

"The Spirit gives life, the body doesn't count, the words that I have spoken to you are spirit and are life." (John 6:63)

 

 

There has been much controversy over the exact meaning of this verse. The main question is what "flesh" refers to ( sarx )?

1. The most natural reference would be back to Jesus' previous paragraph - eating his flesh and drinking his blood. If we take "eating my flesh" figuratively as "believing in Jesus," as I have argued, the meaning would be as follows: Spirit gives life, faith in me counts for nothing . But this does not make sense. Rather, it is a contrast between Spirit and flesh.
2. If we take "eating my flesh" literally from the Eucharist, the meaning is as follows: Spirit gives life, eating sacramental flesh counts for free . Zwingli argued along these lines against Luther's view of the real presence. But this assumes that Jesus in this Capernaum discourse was speaking directly about the Lord's Supper taking place later, with the assumption that we simply do not have the evidence.
3. It is more likely that Jesus is not referring to the flesh 6: 53-56, but rather to the contrasting flesh and Spirit, as in his discussion with Nicodemus in John 3: 6: "That which is born of the flesh is flesh and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit ". In this case, "flesh" would mean "the natural principle of man, which cannot give eternal life“. ¹¹ So the meaning of Jesus' words in 6:63 is this: The Spirit gives life; what man can understand and accomplish on his own, he counts free. The words I have told you - spiritually discerned and believed - bring spiritual life, eternal life.

 

 

The Bread of Life Passage and the Lord's Supper

 

 

As indicated earlier, while I do not believe that Jesus intentionally gave this teaching in reference to the sacrament of the Eucharist, I do believe that John, in composing the fourth Gospel, included this discourse knowing that his readers would read it thinking of the Lord's supper. The Bread of Life passage and the Lord's Supper have parallel teachings.

The Lord's Supper deliberately uses elements that remind us of Jesus' flesh and blood: chewy bread reminding us of the body,

red wine to remind us of the blood. 

The act of partaking of the Lord's Supper is certainly feeding on Jesus - a physical symbolic act that speaks of a much deeper communion:

• To feed on the Bread of Life is to believe the words of Jesus and trust Him as the source of our life.
• Consuming the body and blood of Jesus means relying completely on him and the truths he teaches for sustenance and life.

 

 

When we participate in the Lord's Supper, we are commanded to remember Jesus' death for our sins. Our mind also turns to the Spirit of God who raised him from the dead, the same Spirit who gives us spiritual life and will ultimately raise our bodies from the dead on the last day. The Lord's Supper as an act of remembering, reflecting, believing, trusting - this again strengthens us as food for our souls and life for our faith. For the Anglican service directs as the bread is received by the recipient:

"Take and eat this in remembrance that Christ died for you, and feed on it in your heart by faith with thanksgiving."

Feeding on Jesus' words and wallowing in His presence is the essence of trust, of true faith in Him. Yes, partake of His body and blood in the Lord's Supper as a sign that you are truly feeding on Him in your heart - and so grow in faith. Amen.

 

 

source: http://www.jesuswalk.com/lords-supper/8_john6.htm

 

I have modified the text slightly and added my comments.

To sum up, the Catholic Eucharist is not only a misunderstanding of Scripture, but also a symbolic act of cannibalism, and some even say satanism. For the church of Rome as an institution is all about carnality, which is clearly seen in their sexual interests, mammon and power, but also in the Catholic cross on which Jesus still hangs. His body is still hanging there.

 

When I was born again about 8 years ago, the first thing I did was start feeding on the Word of God. It was this Bread of Life, Jesus as the promise of eternal life When I woke up slowly the Holy Spirit was introducing me to all truth and showing me my sins that I had not seen before as a Catholic

I have no hatred for not only Catholics, but any human being. I hate evil and the institution of the church. I was at the post office this morning and despite the vastness of idolatry in the form of Catholic publications, Christmas trees, and the Pope, I had a pleasant conversation with a lady who is Catholic. I like a lot of Catholics. I have in my family, but I know that a significant number of them unfortunately will not be saved because they have believed Satan's lies.

 

Dear Catholic, when you eat the supposed body of Jesus, this transubstantiation of the wafer into the supposed physical body of Jesus, ask yourself if you are now eating a piece of Jesus' leg or some internal organs.

If you understand the text, then do what the Lord Jesus himself recommends in the apocalypse:

 

" And I heard another voice from heaven saying, Come out of him, my people, that ye be not partakers of his sins, and that plagues come upon him" Rev 18

 

Come out of this hypocrisy, hypocrisy.

 

To Protestants.

Your leaders are working with Rome. So I will ask you a question: why did you leave the church if as a denomination you are still there?