About 4 weeks ago, I saw a man among my friends on Facebook who took the action of doing 22 push-ups for 22 days. I did not really know what it was about. Then, about a week ago, I noticed another old acquaintance declared participation in this action. A few days later she nominated her friend.
I don't know much about the hidden purpose, it may have already been written about somewhere on the US site, but I want to present how I see it.
For the very first, let's look at what the action is:
On polska-zbrojna.pl website we have description and source of the action:
„Every day, 22 veterans suffering from PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) commit suicide, according to a study. To draw attention to the disease, which mainly affects servicemen returning from combat missions, the U.S. military has launched a media campaign. For 22 days they do 22 push-ups. The action is also joined by Poles, including major Piotr Jaszczuk, our editorial colleague.
It is not known exactly when the action "22 pushups for 22 KILL challenge" It was the first time that it came to Poland and who was the first to start practicing. - I was nominated by a colleague from Szczecin. He was also nominated by someone, so it is hard to say who was first in Poland," says Lieutenant Jacek Zebryk, a soldier serving in the Veteran's Center. The lieutenant has been doing 22 push-ups for 11 days, and he posts the videos on his Facebook profile. - I want everyone suffering from PTSD to know that they are not alone. I also want to tell Poles how serious Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is. If left untreated, it leads to death," emphasizes Lt. 呕ebryk."
http://polska-zbrojna.pl/home/articleshow/20284?t=22-pompki-dla-weteranow
What's notable about this action, I think, is that these soldiers aren't praying presumably Catholic, they're just doing push-ups, as if those push-ups send energy to disadvantaged soldiers with PTSD. Where is Jesus in all of this? On December 24, everyone will celebrate the birth, but of a god. Not God.
Since all Poles are Christians, maybe it is better to pray for these soldiers for 22 days. It guarantees a greater effect.
The strange coincidence of 22 days of push-ups and 22 days of prayer for missionaries.
Yesterday I received text messages with the following content:
„Prosimy o modlitw臋 za 22 chrze艣cija艅skich misjonarzy, kt贸rzy podobnie jak to si臋 dzieje聽od roku w Etiopii, zostali skazani na 艣mier膰. Teraz jest tak samo w Afganistanie. Wyrok ma by膰 wykonany dzisiaj po po艂udniu przez afga艅skich islamist贸w. Prosimy o przekazanie tej wiadomo艣ci dalej, tak szybko jak to mo偶liwe, 偶eby wiele os贸b modli艂o si臋 za nich.”
It was first sent to me by Kesia. I began to think how good it is for us, and somewhere in the world people are dying in the name of Jesus. However, after a while something told me: but where did you get such information? So I asked Kesja this question. She answered that from the Baptists in Gizycko. She must have been intrigued by my question, because a moment later she sent me an sms saying that she had asked GPC (G艂os Przeladowanych Chrzesciajn) and it turns out that there is no such action at all... One big bluff.
After a while I received several more text messages from other brothers and sisters with the same content. I could be wrong, but to me it seems very clear. Well, a thought occurred to me.
But before I write what I think of the action itself about the 22 supposed missionaries, I will give by way of introduction how I see the near future.
My sense is that we are living on the threshold of the Great Tribulation. Trump has all the makings of an antichrist. Even some of the so-called Christians like the gun-toting Chojecki are fascinated by Trump, and Kowalski is already full of praise.
The phenomenon of Trumpomania may be imminent.
I don't know if we are reading this part of the Bible correctly:
„w贸wczas uka偶e si臋 Niegodziwiec, kt贸rego Pan Jezus zg艂adzi tchnieniem swoich ust i wniwecz obr贸ci [samym] objawieniem swego przyj艣cia. 9 His appearance will be accompanied by the work of Satan, with all his power, among signs and false miracles, 10 [acting] with all deception toward iniquity of those who perish because they have not accepted the love of the truth to receive salvation. 11 Therefore God allows deception to work on them so that they will believe the lie, 12 That all may be judged who have not believed the truth, but have taken a liking to iniquity." 2 Thess.
We all expect fireworks, supernatural events, when in fact the signs have been on the ground for a long time. It was the same with September 23 a year ago. Waiting for a comet, and here's Franko in the US. Seemingly just... I'm not saying on 100% Trump is the antichrist, but he has all the makings.
Here are the signs:
Are there signs? ....
Additionally, Trump will be 70 years, 7 months and 7 days old when he is sworn in.
On election day 8/11/2016 at 9pm I wrote, about Trump winning. Not because it was a certainty, but because he just had almost no chance.
Here's a headline in an American portal after Trump's victory:
„Cud i znaczenie zwyci臋stwa Donalda Trumpa”
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/305697-the-miracle-and-meaning-of-donald-trumps-victory
Surprisingly some of my Christian friends support Trump.
" For false messiahs and false prophets will arise and work great signs and wonders to mislead, if possible, also selected." Mt 24
Yesterday I also spoke with Grazyna, a devoted woman to God, who said she had a dream in which some people came to check if she had a Bible at home.
We are an interconnected system of vessels and who knows if God isn't letting us know this way what is to come. I have slowly stopped believing in the rapture before the WU. Not because of weak faith, not because this dogma is wrong, but it is my gut feeling and logic. If we are raptured, who will testify of God? Apparently two witnesses. That is not enough for the whole world.
It seems to me that we are going to be slaughtered like the Israelites in Egypt.
Let's go back to the text message campaign with the 22 missionaries.
As we can see it is a bluff. A false action. The question is why. One thing that comes to mind is the catching of Christians under roundups during the reign of the antichrist. I may be floating my thoughts too much, but that's my gut feeling and the facts as above. Additionally, there is the Pokemon Go game. If anyone has watched the Death Games or heard about it, then you can elaborate further.
Conclusion on action.
Don't believe mass text message or email campaigns. Check your information.
Lately, I feel that Christians are the most naive people in the world.This is due to an idealized idea of faith. The life of Christians is devoid of life wisdom, as if it were a complete denial of the Book of Proverbs.
I may be wrong in my observations, but I'd rather write about it than have people on my conscience.
Behold, I send you out as sheep among wolves. Be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves. Be on your guard against men! They will judge you and scourge you in their synagogues. They will even bring you before governors and kings for my sake, as a testimony to them and to the Gentiles. When they hand you over, do not worry about how or what you should say.
English 
Polish
There are two possibilities. Either this is the real antichrist or a trap like Nero, Napoleon, Hitler, etc.
one thing is certain: we should not get involved in any political initiatives
What about pro-social activities, i.e. activities in non-governmental organizations, local associations, etc.?
I'd like to know too, because sometimes I wish I could get involved in e.g. helping others... :/.
The 2 Thessalonians 1-9 you quoted is about Babylon - the Vatican.And that antichrist is the pope, because he is the one who exercises religious power over mankind with the complicity of
secular power. It has been so for centuries and it is so now.This is evidenced by ecumenism. Nominal Protestantism, Orthodoxy, Islam, Buddhism are all under the control of Rome. One who knows the history of Rome knows who Paul writes about in his letters. Besides, all the great Reformation scholars pointed to the papacy as the deviant Babylonian church.
Your view, Anne, is one of several views of the apocalypse.
The Bible says: the antichrists were already many. In Paul's day.
So there's no telling that he'll be from Rome
W kwestii Rzymu, Biblia informuje nas 偶e nierz膮dnica zostanie zniszczona i wskazuje nam kryteria okre艣laj膮ce nierz膮dnic臋. Po jej zniszczeniu i dymie po偶aru 艣wiat b臋dzie jeszcze istnia艂 poniewa偶 spo艂eczno艣ci i „kr贸lowie ziemscy” b臋d膮 widzie膰 dym jej po偶aru.
Only then may we learn who the antichrist is, perhaps by the fact that he will want to take both religious and secular/governmental power into his hands at the same time (introducing one government and one religion). This may be the pivotal moment for understanding God's Word (the seals from possible conjecture and interpretation will be uncovered - in the logical sense: seal these words until knowledge grows).
Looking at what is happening in the world, if a false messiah is going to appear it will be in the system that the Vatican has created and is now creating. This is all one big analogy to God's Messiah which is Jesus Christ and the temple system. Just as there was a High Priest in the Temple of Jerusalem, so now the Pope considers himself a High Priest, Paul VI even carried the Koshen with him.
http://wolna-polska.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/a1137.jpg
He was the last of the popes to be crowned king of the world with the tiara. In the 21st century, after 9/11, popes are increasingly renouncing their high position. Benedict has given up the tiara even in his coat of arms, not to mention Francis who wants to humble himself as much as he can.
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herb_papieski
The question is why are they doing this? Perhaps they are waiting for someone to come to take their place, just as Christ took the place of the High Priest in the Temple in Jerusalem with his supremacy over the whole world and his warning to everyone that whoever does not believe in him will die. Satan wants to do exactly the same thing, but he can only threaten our earthly lives.
The demolition of the two WTC columns marks the opening of the gate for their god, who will come as a false messiah, his supremacy encompassing the entire world. Many messages indicate that this is very close.
The new WTC 1 tower built on the ruins of the old ones is exactly 541 meters high. The Hebrew word Israel is 541. America (the beast from the earth) are doing all the work for the beast from the sea to make it possible for the whole world to receive the messiah.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Yr77oPKewDM/Tzpa3j_NjtI/AAAAAAAAAYY/HOBSJ8Hy0TQ/s1600/edc_MessiahLE1.jpg
To better understand why this happens I recommend Walter Veith's lecture.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPu9iEx2Fo0
one thing that surprises me is that there are no comments after Trump's win from both Pope and AD7.
So interesting ie, WTC in the US and maybe Antek in the US will show up
New York City has been and continues to be called the gateway to the new world and the capital of the world, so the entire world theater of end times events is taking place there.
I found another tidbit to keep in mind about why world events happen in NY.
Constantine I the Great the first Roman emperor to convert to Christianity ( he married paganism with Christianity to form the basis of Greater Babylon) was proclaimed emperor in the British city of York in 306 (666).
When the English took control of New Amsterdam they named it New York in honor of James Prince of British York, the same place Constantine was staying in when his father died, who was there with him.
Can someone explain these cards to me? Did they commission someone to make these cards to make it funny that everything fills out and to mock people or what?
There is also a card about a flat Earth, so maybe the theory came from the rulers of the world and specially NASA prepares the photos?
What is the purpose of this misinformation?
To Cupak.
1 Thank you for the video, I wrote my comment when you previously posted it because it also relates to ecumenism.
2. if it is as you write and a false messiah appears in the system created by the vatican, this too can be linked to the fall of the harlot in my comment above.
I.e., when the smoke of its fire appears, i.e., the harlot falls, then we have two options: the pope rescues himself by fleeing and on the ruins of the world chaos takes over the power of the world, or in the meantime of this fleeing his successor will appear who will take over the power of the world (religious and secular) just from the system which created the Vatican.
Stupidity and bullshit
I share as much as possible Ani's opinion, as that which is clearly indicated by the pages of Scripture, and the spiritual nature of the Vatican institution.
And antichrists plural:
„Ka偶dy za艣 duch, kt贸ry nie uznaje Jezusa, nie jest z Boga; i to jest duch Antychrysta” (1 J 4:3).
By艂a i jest masa takich ludzi na tej planecie. Chocia偶by ci, kt贸rzy uznaj膮 „zast臋pczego Jezusa” w postaci papie偶a, lub w og贸le nie uznaj膮 Jezusa. Papie偶a, kt贸ry nadaje sobie cechy Boga, Jezusa i Ducha 艢wi臋tego.
„Antychryst nadchodzi, bo oto teraz w艂a艣nie pojawi艂o si臋 wielu Antychryst贸w” (1 J 2:18) sugeruje wyra藕nie, 偶e wczasach kiedy by艂o wielu antychryst贸w, ten w艂a艣ciwy dopiero nadchodzi艂.
„Wiecie, co go teraz powstrzymuje, aby objawi艂 si臋 w swoim czasie.” (2 Tes 2:6) powstrzymywa艂a go (Watykan) 贸wczesna w艂adza rzymska.
Even if Trump pretended to be a super God-fearing man, he will never achieve 10% the kind of authority that the Pope had and still has over the entire world, not just the US.
Trump, despite his significant support, also has large numbers of opponents, while the ecumenical pope's opponents are a handful. And by spreading the philosophy of ecumenism and throwing away principles in favor of gathering as many sheep as possible, these opponents will become fewer and fewer.
I have been thinking about this and according to me, since these feasts are to be the last, time will tell, it is highly possible to reorganize the existing structures of the serpent in the world, including mainly political-religious. The archetype of the antichrist is Antiochus IV. He was a secular man much like Pharaoh persecuting the Israelites.
We'll wait and see.
You cited a quote:
"But every spirit that acknowledges not Jesus is not of God; and this is the spirit of Antichrist" (1 J 4:3)
This quote applies to a wide range of people who meet his criteria, it is not limited to just one pope (even though most church reformers as well as Protestants were certain about the pope and this was their teaching - but was it true?).
Just as God has inspired us for Christ's work, the devil has deceived them for antichrist's work....
To me, this action of praying for 22 Christian missionaries, gave me food for thought when I received a text message.
I saw this earlier than yesterday and it didn't match what was on fb with the text message.
In the end, I found confirmation that it was a bluff, a fake.
Well done for thinking. We cannot trust everything without limit. The evil one uses our goodness for his own ends
We need to have limited trust, investigate, check(I am not talking about morbid distrust :p)....
Regarding the Simpsons and the Tramp, the case in this material is somewhat different:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tvYMhd8bLk
Swoj膮 drog膮 ten odcinek o Trumpie w „Simpsonach” jest chyba rzeczywi艣cie z roku 2015!M贸wi臋 „chyba” bo weryfikowa艂em to raptem kilka minut, a to s艂aba/kr贸tka weryfikacja informacji :)…No艣nik informacji jakim jest internet ma du偶o zalet, ale i wad. Jedn膮 z wad jest to, 偶e jest wielkim „艣mietnikiem” informacyjnym.
I wrote the above comment without seeing Magdalena's comment, with the video about Trump and Simpson...I understand that the video explains more....
A healthy distance always comes in handy 馃檪
Here's the thing...there are plenty of lies all around in the official media. But a lot of information from sources opposed to the mainstream, isn't true either. Human error is the cause, and probably some of the information is also deliberate disinformation. The only true source of truth is God!
Peter, it would probably be a good idea to remove that graphic with Trump so as not to mislead people. Or correct it in the comments :p
About
Thank you.
Please 馃檪 I'm sorry.
Thanks super job? To the glory of our God.
Summing up the article with verses from Matthew a masterpiece, this is how we are to behave.
I don't really believe that the rapture will be before the great tribulation either, but it remains to be seen, we are to purify ourselves, sanctify ourselves and bring the truth to our neighbors.
Contrary to what you might think, I guess the rapture before the Great Tribulation is not provable on the basis of a single verse. And that strongly makes one think, doesn't it?
Yes, and that's what I'm relying on. The kidnapping theory before the Great Tribulation is a collection of circumstantial evidence.
Nowhere in the Bible does it explicitly mention rapture before.
Not only that, but there will be another problem just like in the film of those messianic Jews 119 ministries.
They think that the raptured will be evil....
It's me again... No one will be surprised... 馃檪 .
„Pochwyceni” (?) 藕li:
„Chocia偶 padnie u boku twego tysi膮c,
And ten thousand at thy right hand,
You, however, will not be affected by this.
Yes, you will see with your own eyes
And you will watch retribution on the ungodly"
I recommend the entire Psalm 91
„Pochwyceni” to nie jest dobre okre艣lenie;
more accurate is uprooted from the earth...
It also seems to me personally that the rapture will not be before the Great Tribulation. People who have God in their hearts will be tormented and eventually murdered...How it will be, we may be given to see....
Here...
http://detektywprawdy.pl/2014/12/21/tak-prawdopodobnie-bedzie-wygladal-wielki-ucisk/
Yes I watched this flimk with this thesis it gives you food for thought https://youtu.be/BioaWexWeu4
I finally managed to watch this thesis of 119 Ministries. The beginning held together and everything seems logical, but the end with leaving the good guys and taking the bad guys makes absolutely no sense.
After all, Lot was taken from a land that God had judged. Same for Noah, God took him into the ark and punishment fell on the land from which he came. The analogy of the virgins - the bridegroom took the wise inside.
„Ludu m贸j wyjdzcie z niej…”. W samej Apokalipsie mamy wyj艣膰 ze z艂ego miejsca. 呕li zawsze zostawiali i nie wiedzieli, 偶e nadszed艂 s膮d.
If Jesus will be taking away at the time of His return after the Tribulation it will be the elect, not the wicked....
*stayed
Well, what about the verse Philippians 3:17-21?
Long topic...
I've already tried to explain this in many commentaries, but I'll just quickly say that Paul writing these words as a native of Israel and also being among the first Christians was hoping to live in heaven along with the 144,000 - the firstfruits to God and the Lamb (Rev. 7 and 14).
The rest of the saved will inherit the earth.
The wicked of the earth will be exterminated.
I don't know why such a simple scheme of salvation remains misunderstood....
But what land are you talking about? About the 1000-year kingdom or the New Jerusalem? It's not that simple. Where else is there room for heaven...
Rev. 21:1-5
„I widzia艂em nowe niebo i nowa ziemi臋, albowiem pierwsze…przemin臋艂y”
„Oto wszystko nowym czyni臋”
Mat. 5:18 „Dop贸ki nie przeminie niebo i ziemia, ani jedna jota, ani jedna kreska nie przeminie z zakonu…”
The earth as we know it and the works of men upon it will burn up (II Peter 3:10), but also the heavens with a crash will pass away, for in them evil has been done through fallen angels.
The 1000-year Millennium will be some sort of transition period in which Christ will teach, heal the nations, raise the dead, and at the end of those days destroy all evil and restore order as in Eden. But it must be something much more wonderful, because it takes longer to prepare it 馃檪 .
Eden was a garden, and the New Jerusalem will be a city state where God will dwell with people....
Gotquestions: What is 119 Ministries?
Note: The following information is based on our overall assessment of the 119 Ministries organization. As with any active organization, this can change dynamically depending on the organization's activities at any given time. The information is correct in our opinion at the time of this writing.
119 Ministries is an organization with Hebrew roots that operates primarily on the Internet, where it actively promotes its theology. The group takes its name from Psalm 119, which deals with the Law of God. The movement believes that Jesus did not invalidate many Old Testament restrictions like dietary restrictions, ceremonial purity, etc. This is a view long rejected by most Christian theologians.
Wiele z nauczycieli z ruch贸w tzw. „hebrajskich korzeni” (Hebrew Roots) przedstawia poprawne pogl膮dy na zbawienie, grzech, Jezusa Chrystusa i Bibli臋. Cz臋sto jednak odrzucaj膮聽Tr贸jc臋. Podej艣cie, kt贸re prezentuj膮 zmusza ich niejako do problematycznego rozpatrywania Nowego Testamentu. Jasny sens Pisma jest taki, 偶e Prawo znalaz艂o swoje wype艂nienie w osobie Jezusa Chrystusa co oznacza艂o koniec legalizmu.
119 Ministries claim that clear statements in scripture such as the letter to the Galatians have been misinterpreted. However, this conclusion is based solely on what one is trying to prove. (As we see in every movement whatever, almost everyone is able to prove their point with Scripture-unless they understand it).
Przewodnie has艂o 119 Ministries brzmi: „test everything” („wszystko badaj”), co podkre艣la ich apologetyczno-testuj膮c膮 postaw臋 by promowa膰 ich wierzenia. Jednak, je艣li osoba nie jest z g贸ry pewna, 偶e ich za艂o偶enia s膮聽w艂a艣ciwe, informacje podane przez t臋聽grup臋 nie wytrzymuj膮 szczeg贸艂owej pr贸by przyjrzenia si臋聽im.
Innym problemem zwi膮zanym z 119 Ministries jak i wieloma organizacjami „Hebrew Roots” jest tendencja do szczeg贸艂owego skupiania si臋 na drobnych szczeg贸艂ach. Na przyk艂ad, wyznaczaj膮 dok艂adny dzie艅 lub ksi臋偶ycowy cykl jakiego艣 biblijnego 艣wi臋ta. Albo spekulacje nt. krwawych ksi臋偶yc贸w b膮dz pytania czy doba powinna si臋 rozpoczyna膰 od wschodu lub zachodu S艂o艅ca. Legalistyczne przecedzanie jak to (Tytusa 3:9) jest dok艂adnie tak膮聽sam膮聽biurokracj膮 od jakiej mieli艣my by膰 uwolnieni dzi臋ki sko艅czonemu dzie艂u. Taki legalizm wydaje si臋 wygodny, bo nasza duchowo艣膰 staje si臋 kwesti膮 przestrzegania „listy” od wydarzenia do wydarzenia zamiast bezustannego poddawania si臋聽woli Bo偶ej w naszym 偶yciu.
Paradoksalnie, mimo zalece艅 do przestrzegania ca艂ej Tory jako obecnie obowi膮zuj膮cej chrze艣cijan, wi臋kszo艣膰 ruch贸w Hebrew Roots (judaizuj膮cych) pozwala sobie na zachowania, kt贸re dla starotestamentowych 呕yd贸w by艂yby ra偶膮cym nadu偶yciem jak: posiadanie g艂adko ogolonej twarzy czy noszenie ubra艅 z tkaniny tkanej z r贸偶nych materia艂贸w. 119 Ministries nie jest tu wyj膮tkiem, odrzucaj膮 wyra藕ne nauczanie Tory o nieobcinaniu w艂os贸w (Kap艂a艅ska 19:27 „Nie b臋dziecie strzygli w艂os贸w dooko艂a waszej g艂owy, ani nie podcinaj ko艅ca twojej brody.”) jako nawi膮zanie do poga艅skich praktyk w tym samym czasie twierdz膮c, 偶e jedzenie wieprzowiny jest nieczyste mimo jawnych o艣wiadcze艅 (Marka 7:19).
There are many questions, things to examine within the teachings of 119 Ministries. Those involved in Hebrews-rooted movements generally have good intentions, and their core message regarding salvation is essentially true. However, their approach to Scripture is heavily prejudiced and cannot be truly sustainable except for those who have assumed their truthfulness from the beginning.
I translated it when I had a moment from gotquestions, out of curiosity who are the ones from 119 Ministries, if anyone finds it useful I'm uploading it, because I don't know if it's possible to add to the Polish page.
There doesn't seem to be any deception.
Thank you for the translation.
I haven't explored this site, but I generally support following the Law, but not the Ritual Law.
A topic for a very long article. I am able to prove the obligation to keep the Law. I probably won't satisfy everyone, but I will show the seriousness of God's Law to the reasonable.
Then there is this page that Kesia provided with the 1050 commands of the Lord Jesus from the NT listed. If this is indeed the New Covenant between God and men, then I think that although grace is sufficient, as we know faith without works is dead, so joining the New Covenant should be followed by good deeds and keeping all the commandments, that is these 1050? The Lord Jesus repeated 9 of the 10 commandments, therefore I do not have an inner need for today, especially to keep Saturdays holy, but I may change my mind.
I have read in two places that the Torah is not divided into ceremonial and moral because it is holy in its entirety with its 613 precepts and a Jew would be offended by dividing it into lesser and more important precepts. I can't comment because I don't know it. Besides, I have only read the entire Torah once and it took me a long time....
For the time being, I am crawling in my faith.
The problem is that we do not have to fulfill these 1050 commandments to be saved. Jesus fulfilled them for us. On the other hand, if one is born of water and the Spirit, he will be led alone to the Law of God.
Not only me but many people wrote that they had some of their sins removed at the new birth even though they did not ask God to remove them. This is how the Holy Spirit works. He removes some and shows some later. Some sins I had to interpret in Scripture, some on the internet, and some my conscience (DS) told me. Likewise with transgression. I would have to be hypocritical to myself, eating pork and at the same time knowing that pigs were the vacuum cleaners of the city and do not sweat and therefore retain toxins.
I'm not imposing it on anyone and I'm not going to chastise them for it.
I can only push away people who do not recognize the divinity of Jesus, who delete the Scriptures, who do not deliberately respect God's Law (mainly the Decalogue) and who do not love their neighbor. All others are brothers and sisters in the faith to me.
We don't have to fulfill anything for salvation, because we can be converted an hour before we die and that's all thanks to Jesus, but we do need to have a signpost on how to act in life. Hence the commandments.
It just happened to me that some sins were taken away from me right away, and some I will call stubborn ones I still have to work on. The Divine Word strongly convinces me of sin. If I am not sure about something and the Word of God does not reveal it to me, I ask other Christians and read their teachings. There is no other commandment as divisive as the commandment about the Sabbath, so I left it for this moment. I do not know what to do, so I wait.
and you're doing the right thing.
You can see that you are seeking God and God Himself will show you everything, not any website or priest.
Oh, then I see that Emilia and I are on a very similar page regarding the Sabbath, we see it similarly. The link with the 1050 Commandments of the Law of Christ from Kesia was at least really helpful to me here, as was that translation above warning against 119 Ministries, for which I also thank you in the name of Jesus (they had already seemed suspicious to me). And that Fruchtenbaum article linked by Adi that I translated was also helpful, also thank you.
I got text messages about these missionaries from Aldona and Diana yesterday and I was fooled... Overall, this article brings up so many issues that I have to sit down and sort it all out....
Yesterday I received a letter from Agnieszka and Diana and I forwarded it to Jack, Lena and Zdzisio, so someone did a hapening, well it's a pity that such false actions appear. But you can never have too many prayers, maybe it will help other oppressed or imprisoned Christians that we do not know about. Greetings:) With the Lord God 馃檪 .
Exactly prayer is never too much?
Now we have learned our lesson and should check the source.
On the other hand, it's good that prayer support requests are going out so quickly, because you never know who needs support.
This is true. Because Christians are indeed persecuted and humiliated in many places on earth.
So even though there are text messages with false information, it does not change the fact that prayer for all Christians is most needed and advisable.
To Aldona
I actually wanted to write you later that it was a fake, but I gave up.
I got it from 2 people, including Christopher, so I decided to let it go. But well done Lenka you write, we tested the line, it works great 馃檪 .
Whether it's Trump or Killary I wouldn't believe them even if I asked them the time. It seems to me that at such high levels of power there are no coincidences, and Trump is very pro-Israel so he is definitely in someone's favor. And as for the antichrist, John writes that he will come in the midst of FALSE/RELATED miracles (depending on the translation). John lived and wrote in the 1st century and if people of that time saw today's technology they might have taken it for witchcraft or miracles. Airplanes, holograms on buildings, wireless communications, etc. Also the miracles agree in my opinion but whether Trump is the antichrist, well time will tell. I personally do not believe in the rapture and consider it a doctrine for cowards because if Christ suffered how much more will we. The key will be the appearance of the two witnesses and it is them I am waiting for.
„A co do antychrysta to Jan pisze 偶e przyb臋dzie w艣r贸d FA艁SZYWYCH/RZEKOMYCH cud贸w (zale偶nie od t艂umaczenia). Jan 偶y艂 i pisa艂 w I w. i gdyby ludzie z tamtych czas贸w zobaczyli dzisiejsz膮 technologi臋 mogli by j膮 wzi膮膰 za czary czy cuda. Samoloty, hologramy na budynkach, 艂膮czno艣膰 bezprzewodowa itp. Tak偶e cuda si臋 zgadzaj膮 moim zdaniem ale czy Trump to antychryst, no c贸偶 czas poka偶e”
Good point, and that's why I was thinking of it when I wrote about signs understood differently
I'm not sure if it's a blue beam project or not... :/
Whatever the case, I'm not worried...
Rev.5 And one of the Elders says to me:
„Przesta艅 p艂aka膰:
Behold, the Lion of the tribe of Judah was victorious,
An offshoot of David..."
Hallelujah!!! 馃檪 馃檪
Peter, with trump it's a fake, the episode was from 2015, not 2000 as someone misspelled on the internet.
Which doesn't change the fact that in a 1999 episode (available on youtubeE) of Bart to the Future, hillary clinton congratulates president trump.
I'm sorry in advance that I put this here. This is not my text, but I borrowed it from fb from my brother in faith Arkadiusz.
Chronological list of Catholic dogmas
inconsistent with Scripture.
The dates given at the beginning of each paragraph are approximate in some cases.
320 – Za cesarza Konstantyna chrze艣cija艅stwo sta艂o si臋 oficjaln膮 religi膮 Imperium Rzymskiego. Wtedy do Ko艣cio艂a wesz艂o wielu po艂owicznie nawr贸conych pogan, kt贸rzy czcili dalej poga艅sk膮 Kr贸low膮 Niebios (Izyda, Diana, Kali), tyle 偶e pod imieniem Maryi, celebrowali poga艅skie 艣wi臋ta pod chrze艣cija艅skimi nazwami, czcili dalej obrazy, pos膮gi i bo偶ki, ale pod imionami 艣wi臋tych (m臋czennik贸w), np. kult Dionizosa przeniesiono na 艣w. Dionizego, a kult Izydy na 艣w. Izydora. Wszystko to nie mia艂o oparcia w Pi艣mie 艢wi臋tym, co otwarcie przyznaje ksi膮dz W. Zaleski pisz膮c: „W Nowym Testamencie nie mamy 艣wiadectw potwierdzaj膮cych cze艣膰 wizerunk贸w”.1 Przykazanie Bo偶e zakazuje takiego kultu: „Nie b臋dziesz czyni艂 偶adnej rze藕by ani 偶adnego obrazu… oddawa艂 im pok艂onu i nie b臋dziesz im s艂u偶y艂” (Wyj.20:4-5). Pan Jezus poleci艂 nam oddawa膰 cze艣膰 Bogu wy艂膮cznie w duchu i prawdzie, nie za艣 poprzez przedmioty wykonane ludzk膮 r臋k膮 (Jan 4:23-24). Czasem usprawiedliwia si臋 to m贸wi膮c, 偶e 艣wi臋te przedmioty tylko symbolizuj膮 Boga, ale poganie, kt贸rzy je czcili te偶 tak wierzyli, a jednak B贸g nazywa艂 ich praktyki ba艂wochwalstwem (Iz.44:9-20).
321 – Konstantyn Wielki, kt贸rego rodzina czci艂a bo偶ka s艂o艅ca zwanego Sol Invictus, gdy zacz膮艂 przewodzi膰 soborom chrze艣cija艅skim, wywy偶szy艂 specjalnym edyktem poga艅skie 艣wi臋to s艂o艅ca – niedziel臋: „W czcigodny dzie艅 S艂o艅ca [venerabili die Solis], niech urz臋dnicy i mieszka艅cy miast wypoczywaj膮, za艣 wszystkie sklepy i warsztaty niech b臋d膮 pozamykane.”2 Prof. Aleksander Krawczuk trafnie zauwa偶y艂: „Mo偶na rzec bez przesady, 偶e edykt Konstantyna obowi膮zuje w wi臋kszo艣ci kraj贸w 艣wiata a偶 po dzie艅 dzisiejszy; 贸w bowiem ’ dies Solis’ to oczywi艣cie nasza niedziela.”3 Do kultu s艂onecznego wci膮偶 nawi膮zuje nazwa niedzieli w niekt贸rych j臋zykach (np. ang. Sunday, niem. Sonntag). W pierwszych wiekach chrze艣cijanie 艣wi臋cili si贸dmy dzie艅 tygodnia – sobot臋, zgodnie z IV przykazaniem Bo偶ym (Wyj.20:8-11). Z czasem wielu z nich zaprzesta艂o tego (zw艂aszcza w Rzymie), ale nie ze wzgl臋d贸w teologicznych, lecz aby unikn膮膰 prze艣ladowa艅 skierowanych przeciw 呕ydom, kt贸rzy byli znani ze 艣wi臋cenia sabatu, dlatego te偶 Rzymianie mylili z nimi chrze艣cijan. Drug膮 przyczyn膮 by艂a popularno艣膰 dnia s艂o艅ca w艣r贸d pogan, kt贸rych Ko艣ci贸艂 chcia艂 za wszelk膮 cen臋 pozyska膰. Jeszcze jednak w V wieku historyk chrze艣cija艅ski napisa艂: „Mimo, 偶e wszystkie ko艣cio艂y na ca艂ym 艣wiecie maj膮 nabo偶e艅stwo co tydzie艅 w sabat, to chrze艣cijanie w Aleksandrii i Rzymie, na podstawie jakiej艣 starodawnej tradycji, zaprzestali tego.”4
431 – Sob贸r w Efezie颅 przemianowa艂 Maryj臋 z Christotokos, a wi臋c „matka Chrystusa”, na Theotokos – „Matka Boska”.5 Tytu艂 ten jest niestosowny, gdy偶 sugeruje, 偶e Maryja urodzi艂a Boga, za艣 cz艂owiek nie mo偶e urodzi膰 Boga – stworzenie nie mo偶e urodzi膰 Stworzyciela. S艂owo Bo偶e m贸wi, 偶e Jezus „chocia偶 by艂 w postaci Bo偶ej” wypar艂 si臋 bosko艣ci (Flp.2:6-7) i narodzi艂 jako cz艂owiek. I tak jak Jego ludzka natura nie mia艂a ojca, tak te偶 Jego boska natura nie mia艂a matki! Co znamienne, Efez, gdzie uchwalono ten dogmat, by艂 stolic膮 kultu Kr贸lowej Niebios – Diany. Poganie stawiali jej kapliczki przy drogach, a jej wizerunki umieszczali w domach na d艂ugo zanim zwyczaje te powi膮zano z kultem Maryi.
500 - The clergy of the Roman Church began to be distinguished by their dress from other believers, although previously they had dressed like government officials and therefore like the rest of society.
508 – Pierwszy katolicki kr贸l Frank贸w – Chlodwik pokona艂 resztki Wizygot贸w, co pozwoli艂o papiestwu podporz膮dkowa膰 sobie niemal ca艂膮 Europ臋 Zachodni膮. Odt膮d w艂adze 艣wieckie podlega艂y Ko艣cio艂owi.6 Prorocy Bo偶y nazywali zawsze taki zwi膮zek mi臋dzy Ko艣cio艂em a w艂adz膮 艣wieck膮 „nierz膮dem” (Jer.2:20-31; Ez.16:17-19; Oz.2:5) i „obrzydliwo艣ci膮” (Apok. 18:9). Daniel zapowiedzia艂, 偶e ten stan przetrwa 1290 lat (Dan.12:11), a wi臋c do 1798 roku. I faktycznie, ta sama Francja, kt贸rej wojska w 508 roku pomog艂y papiestwu uzyska膰 wp艂yw na w艂adze 艣wieckie Europy, dok艂adnie w 1290 lat p贸藕niej, w 1798 roku, zlikwidowa艂a pa艅stwo papieskie, zadaj膮c mu tzw. „艣mierteln膮 ran臋” (Apok.13:3), a Rewolucja Francuska wprowadzi艂a rozdzia艂 Ko艣cio艂a od pa艅stwa, kt贸ry w wielu pa艅stwach 艣wiata trwa do dzi艣 z korzy艣ci膮 dla pa艅stwa i dla Ko艣cio艂a.
538 - With the Arian Ostrogoths expelled from Rome, Emperor Justinian's decree putting the Bishop of Rome above all other bishops came into effect. Roman bishops claimed apostolic succession from Peter to strengthen their claim to authority over all of Christendom, though the first bishop of Rome was not Peter, but a certain Linus. The apostle Peter was never bishop of Rome. Apostolic succession is pure speculation, which the Bible does not support, and history disputes, because sometimes two or three people have held the papacy at the same time, excommunicating each other, buying or selling the papal throne for money, such as Pope Benedict IX (1032-45), who sold his office to Gregory VI (1045-6). Thus it is impossible to speak of any apostolic succession in Rome.
538 – Podczas synodu w Orleanie, Ko艣ci贸艂 rzymski wyda艂 bardziej rygorystyczne prawo niedzielne ni偶 edykt Konstantyna z 321 r. zakazuj膮c w niedziel臋 wszelkich prac.7 Prorok Daniel zapowiedzia艂, 偶e odst臋pcza moc religijna powa偶y si臋 w 艣redniowieczu na zmian臋 IV przykazania Bo偶ego, a wi臋c tego, kt贸re wi膮偶e si臋 z czasem: „B臋dzie zamierza艂 zmieni膰 czasy i Prawo” (Dn.7:25). Kardyna艂 J. Gibbons przyznaje to otwarcie: „Oczywi艣cie, Ko艣ci贸艂 katolicki twierdzi, 偶e zmiana sabatu na niedziel臋 by艂a jego dzie艂em.”8 Przykazanie IV w przek艂adzie ks. Jakuba Wujka brzmi tak: „Pami臋taj, aby艣 dzie艅 sobotni 艣wi臋ci艂. Sze艣膰 dni robi膰 b臋dziesz i b臋dziesz wykonywa艂 wszystkie roboty twoje; ale si贸dmego sabat Pana, Boga twego, jest: nie b臋dziesz wykonywa艂 we艅 偶adnej roboty… Przez sze艣膰 dni bowiem czyni艂 Pan niebo i ziemi臋, i morze, i wszystko, co w nich jest, a odpocz膮艂 dnia si贸dmego; i dlatego pob艂ogos艂awi艂 Pan dniowi sobotniemu i po艣wi臋ci艂 go.” (Wyj.20:8-11).
590 – Pierwsi chrze艣cijanie modlili si臋 wy艂膮cznie do Boga. W p贸藕niejszych wiekach jednak zacz臋to modli膰 si臋 i szuka膰 po艣rednictwa u 艣wi臋tych i Maryi. Biblia uczy jednak wyra藕nie, 偶e jedyn膮 osob膮 przez kt贸r膮 mo偶emy przyj艣膰 do Ojca jest Jezus Chrystus: „Albowiem jeden jest B贸g, jeden te偶 po艣rednik mi臋dzy Bogiem a lud藕mi, cz艂owiek Chrystus Jezus” (1Tym.2:5). Jezus sam powiedzia艂: „Ja jestem droga i prawda, i 偶ywot, nikt nie przychodzi do Ojca, tylko przeze Mnie” (Jan 14:6). S艂owa „tylko przeze Mnie” wykluczaj膮 po艣rednictwo 偶ywych (np. kap艂an贸w), zmar艂ych (np. 艣wi臋tych czy Maryi), niebia艅skich istot czy duchowych przewodnik贸w (np. anio艂贸w). Jezus przestrzeg艂 nas przed innymi po艣rednikami: „Zaprawd臋, zaprawd臋 powiadam wam, kto nie wchodzi przez drzwi do owczarni, lecz w inny spos贸b si臋 tam dostaje, ten jest z艂odziejem i zb贸jc膮… Ja jestem drzwiami dla owiec” (Jan 10:1.7).
593 – Papie偶 Grzegorz I zacz膮艂 naucza膰 o czy艣膰cu – miejscu gdzie dusze zmar艂ych cierpi膮, dop贸ki nie sp艂ac膮 d艂ugu lub nie zostan膮 wykupione przez ofiary 偶ywych. O czy艣膰cu nie ma jednak 偶adnej wzmianki w Pi艣mie 艢wi臋tym. Kardyna艂 N. Wiseman w swym wyk艂adzie doktryn katolickich przyznaje to, pisz膮c, 偶e w Pi艣mie 艢wi臋tym czytelnik „nie znajdzie ani s艂owa o czy艣膰cu.”9 Zamiast o czy艣膰cu czytamy w nim: „Postanowione ludziom raz umrze膰, a potem s膮d” (Hebr.9:27). Ludzie otrzymaj膮 nagrod臋 lub kar臋 przy zmartwychwstaniu, a nie zaraz po 艣mierci, jak wierzyli poganie. Pan Jezus powiedzia艂: „Oto przyjd臋 wkr贸tce, a zap艂ata moja jest ze mn膮, by odda膰 ka偶demu wed艂ug jego uczynku.” (Apok.22:12).
595 - Pope Gregory I was the first to order repression of Christians who celebrated the seventh day of the week, Saturday, many of whom lived in the Alps and the British Isles, among other places, where the power of the Roman Church had long failed to reach.10
600 - Gregory I imposed Latin as the only language used for worship, even though Latin was not known to everyone at the time. This order was contrary to the Bible, which recommends that only commonly understood language be used for worship (1 Cor.14:9).
709 - The popes, by ordering people to kiss their feet, introduced a pagan custom inconsistent with the teachings and spirit of the Gospel (see Acts 10:25-26; Rev.19:10; 22:9).
787 – Sob贸r w Nicei dopu艣ci艂 kult krzy偶a, relikwii i obraz贸w 艣wi臋tych, cho膰 jeszcze synod w Elwirze (306 r.) orzek艂, 偶e „nie nale偶y czci膰 obraz贸w, ani modli膰 si臋 przed nimi”. Dopuszczaj膮c kult obraz贸w i relikwii anulowano II przykazanie Bo偶e, kt贸re go zakazuje (Wyj.20:3-6). Aby jednak wci膮偶 zgadza艂a si臋 liczba przykaza艅 Bo偶ych (dziesi臋膰) ostatnie przykazanie na dwie cz臋艣ci, dlatego w katechizmach katolickich nie ma ono nawet podmiotu i brzmi: „Ani 偶adnej rzeczy, kt贸ra jego jest”. Nast臋pstwem tej zmiany w przykazaniach Bo偶ych by艂 trwaj膮cy do dzi艣 kult relikwii i obraz贸w.
1079 – Papie偶 Grzegorz VII, kt贸ry wywodzi艂 si臋 z kr臋g贸w zakonnych, wprowadzi艂 celibat, kt贸ry przedtem obowi膮zywa艂 tylko zakonnik贸w. Do XI wieku duchowni mieli 偶ony i dzieci, gdy偶 i aposto艂owie byli 偶onaci, np. Piotr (Mat.8:14-15; 1Kor.9:5). Pismo 艢wi臋te naucza bowiem, 偶e duchownym czy biskupem mo偶e by膰 tylko ten, kto si臋 wcze艣niej sprawdzi艂 jako g艂owa rodziny: „Je艣li kto艣 d膮偶y do biskupstwa, po偶膮da dobrego zadania. Biskup wi臋c powinien by膰 nienaganny, m膮偶 jednej 偶ony… dobrze rz膮dz膮cy w艂asnym domem, trzymaj膮cy dzieci w uleg艂o艣ci” (1Tym.3:1-4).
1090 – Podczas pierwszych krucjat chrze艣cijanie przej臋li na Wschodzie r贸偶aniec. S艂u偶y艂 on poganom do zmawiania modlitw ku czci bogini Kali, czczonej na Wschodzie jako Dziewica i Kr贸lowa Niebios, dlatego wi臋kszo艣膰 pacierzy r贸偶a艅cowych skierowanych jest do Kr贸lowej Niebios. R贸偶aniec rozpowszechni艂 rodzaj mechanicznej modlitwy, gdzie modl膮cy si臋 powtarza w k贸艂ko te same s艂owa, czasem i bezmy艣lnie, jak to czynili poganie, kt贸rym chodzi艂o o ilo艣膰 pacierzy, a nie o ich jako艣膰. Pan Jezus przestrzeg艂 przed tak膮 modlitw膮, m贸wi膮c: „A modl膮c si臋, nie b膮d藕cie wielom贸wni jak poganie; albowiem oni mniemaj膮, 偶e dla swej wielom贸wno艣ci b臋d膮 wys艂uchani” (Mat.6:7).
1163 - The Council of Tours led by Pope Alexander III ordered secular authorities to imprison people declared heretics by the Roman Church. Confiscation of the property of the accused was an additional motivation for the secular authorities to imprison and burn at the stake as many of the accused as possible.
1184 - Pope Lucius III claimed a portion of the possessions of those accused of heresy for the benefit of the Church.11 He and German Emperor Frederick Barbarossa ordered the persecution and killing of heretics through secular authorities, marking the formal beginning of the Inquisition as a church-state institution. Church inquisitors handed over those judged to the state with a clause not to put them to death, but this was a hypocritical formality, as they were present to see that the death sentence was carried out, and when it was not, they accused the officials responsible of aiding heretics. The intolerance and persecution born of this union of Church and State was contrary to the spirit of the Gospel. The Lord Jesus and the apostles never imposed their beliefs on anyone, nor did they use force or secular authority to impose their doctrines on society.
1190 – Ko艣ci贸艂 zacz膮艂 sprzedawa膰 odpusty za grzechy, cho膰 Nowy Testament uczy, 偶e zbawienie jest darem Bo偶ym w Chrystusie i nie mo偶na go naby膰 za pieni膮dze: „艁ask膮 bowiem jeste艣cie zbawieni przez wiar臋. A to pochodzi nie od was, lecz jest darem Boga: nie z uczynk贸w, aby si臋 nikt nie chlubi艂” (Efez. 2:8-9); „Je偶eli za艣 dzi臋ki 艂asce, to ju偶 nie ze wzgl臋du na uczynki, bo inaczej 艂aska nie by艂aby 艂ask膮” (Rzym. 11:6). Zbawienia nie mo偶na naby膰, gdy偶 jest owocem doskona艂ej ofiary Jezusa, do kt贸rej nie mo偶na doda膰 niczego. Mo偶na j膮 tylko przyj膮膰 lub odrzuci膰. Gdyby艣my mogli zbawi膰 si臋 z grzech贸w sami, np. cierpieniem czy ofiarami, Chrystus nie musia艂by przychodzi膰, aby umrze膰 za nas. Zbawienie z 艂aski nie neguje oczywi艣cie dobrych uczynk贸w, tyle 偶e s膮 one rezultatem przyj臋cia zbawienia, a nie 艣rodkiem do niego (Gal.5:22-23).
1200 – Do XII wieku chrzczono przez zanurzenie, gdy偶 tylko taki chrzest m贸g艂 symbolizowa膰 艣mier膰 Chrystusa i Jego zmartwychwstanie oraz pogrzebanie starego cz艂owieka i wynurzenie nawr贸conego. Nowotestamentowe s艂owo „chrzcz臋” (gr. baptidzo) znaczy „zanurzam” (Mat.3:16; Dz.Ap.8:38-39). Do dzi艣 w Gnie藕nie czy w po艂udniowej Europie, gdzie zachowa艂y si臋 wczesne ko艣cio艂y, mo偶na zobaczy膰 baptysteria, w kt贸rych chrzczono przez zanurzenie. Kardyna艂 J. Gibbons przyzna艂: „Najstarsz膮 form膮 Chrztu 艣w. by艂o zanurzenie. Jest to widoczne nie tylko z lektury Ojc贸w Ko艣cio艂a i wczesnych rytua艂贸w 艂aci艅skich oraz wschodnich, lecz tak偶e z list贸w 艣w. Paw艂a, kt贸ry pojmuje Chrzest jako k膮piel (Efez.5:26; Rzym.6:4; Tyt.3:5).”12 Biblijnym warunkiem chrztu jest pouczenie o zasadach wiary, wiara w Jezusa oraz pokuta (Mat.28:19; Mar.16:16; Dz.Ap.2:38). Niemowl臋 nie mo偶e spe艂ni膰 偶adnego z tych trzech warunk贸w, dlatego w pierwszych wiekach chrzczono tylko doros艂ych i to przez zanurzenie. Dopiero sob贸r w Kartaginie w 418 r. opowiedzia艂 si臋 za chrztem dzieci.
1215 – Grzegorz VII (1073-85) chcia艂 wprowadzi膰 spowied藕 uszn膮, gdy sta艂 si臋 papie偶em, ale dogmat w tej sprawie wyda艂 dopiero IV sob贸r latera艅ski.13 Tymczasem Pismo 艢wi臋te nie zawiera ani jednego przyk艂adu spowiedzi usznej! M贸wi o spowiedzi serca, do kt贸rej nie trzeba po艣rednictwa cz艂owieka (Ps.51:1-11). Zach臋ca do wyznawania grzech贸w Bogu, gdy偶 „ka偶dy, kto w Niego wierzy, przez Jego imi臋 otrzymuje odpuszczenie grzech贸w” (Dz.Ap.10:43). Pan Jezus uczy艂 spowiada膰 si臋 bezpo艣rednio do Boga, gdy偶 tylko On mo偶e odpu艣ci膰: „Ty za艣, gdy chcesz si臋 modli膰, wejd藕 do swej izdebki, zamknij drzwi i m贸dl si臋 do Ojca twego… Wy zatem tak si臋 m贸dlcie: Ojcze nasz, kt贸ry jeste艣 w niebie… przebacz nam nasze winy.” (Mat.6:6-12). Aposto艂owie, gdyby otrzymali autorytet odpuszczania grzech贸w korzystaliby z niego, bo okazji nie brakowa艂o, np. gdy Szymon z Samarii pope艂ni艂 grzech, Piotr zamiast go wyspowiada膰, poleci艂 mu, 偶eby wyzna艂 grzech Bogu: „Odwr贸膰 si臋 od tej nieprawo艣ci swojej i pro艣 Pana, czy nie m贸g艂by ci by膰 odpuszczony zamys艂 serca twego” (Dz.Ap.8:22).
1215 – Najwa偶niejsz膮 ceremoni膮 Ko艣cio艂a rzymskiego jest ofiara mszy 艣wi臋tej, a wi臋c przeistoczenie chleba i wina w cia艂o i krew Chrystusa, kt贸re nast臋pnie ofiarowane jest za grzechy. Z teori膮 o przeistoczeniu wyst膮pi艂 mnich Radbertus Paschasius (800-865), ale napotka艂 na sprzeciw teolog贸w katolickich. Dopiero sob贸r latera艅ski IV zatwierdzi艂 j膮 jako dogmat w 1215 roku. Wed艂ug podr臋cznika dla duchownych katolickich: „Sam B贸g pos艂uszny wypowiedzianym przez kap艂an贸w s艂owom B Hoc est corpus meum („To jest cia艂o moje”) – zst臋puje na o艂tarz, przychodzi gdzie go zawo艂aj膮, ilekro膰 go zawo艂aj膮, oddaj膮c si臋 w ich r臋ce, cho膰by byli jego nieprzyjaci贸艂mi. Gdy ju偶 przyjdzie, pozostaje ca艂kowicie w ich gestii; przesuwaj膮 Go z miejsca na miejsce jak im si臋 podoba, mog膮 te偶, je艣li sobie 偶ycz膮, zamkn膮膰 Go w tabernakulum, zostawi膰 na o艂tarzu lub usun膮膰 na zewn膮trz ko艣cio艂a, mog膮 te偶, je艣li tak postanowi膮, spo偶y膰 Jego cia艂o lub poda膰 innym jako pokarm.”14 Wed艂ug katechizmu katolickiego w czasie mszy „ofiaruje si臋 prawdziwe cia艂o i krew Chrystusa, a nie ich symbol.”15 Dogmat m贸wi, 偶e „msza 艣wi臋ta jest prawdziw膮 i dos艂own膮 ofiar膮 sk艂adan膮 Bogu”16 Zaprzecza to jednak ostatnim s艂owom Jezusa: „Wykona艂o si臋!” (Jan 19:30. Pismo 艢wi臋te m贸wi o ofierze Jezusa: „Z艂o偶ywszy raz na zawsze jedn膮 ofiar臋 za grzechy, zasiad艂 po prawicy Boga, oczekuj膮c tylko, a偶 nieprzyjaciele Jego stan膮 si臋 podn贸偶kiem n贸g Jego. Jedn膮 bowiem ofiar膮 udoskonali艂 na wieki tych, kt贸rzy s膮 u艣wi臋ceni… gdzie za艣 jest ich odpuszczenie, tam ju偶 wi臋cej nie zachodzi potrzeba ofiary za grzechy.” (Hebr.10:12-14. 18). Ofiara Jezusa Chrystusa by艂a doskona艂a i nie wymaga powtarzania. Ofiara mszy 艣wi臋tej jest wi臋c nie tylko zb臋dna, ale kwestionuje doskona艂o艣膰 i wystarczalno艣膰 ofiary Chrystusa.
1220 - Pope Honorius commanded that people give the host the same reverence that is due only to God (Latin: latria). Parishioners give the wafer such reverence by saying goodbye as they pass by or enter the church, or at the sight of the host being carried in procession. The wafer, however, is the product of human hands, and therefore to give it the worship due only to God is idolatry, contrary to both God's second commandment (Ex.20:4-6) and the spirit of the Gospel (John 4:24).
1229 – Sob贸r w Tuluzie zakaza艂 pod kar膮 艣mierci wszystkim z wyj膮tkiem duchownych posiadania a nawet czytania Pisma 艢wi臋tego, nie tylko w j臋zykach narodowych, ale i w 艂aci艅skim!17 B贸g natomiast zaleca艂, aby wszyscy wierz膮cy czytali, rozumieli i znali S艂owo Bo偶e: „Ca艂e Pismo przez Boga jest natchnione i po偶yteczne do nauki, do wykrywania b艂臋d贸w, do poprawy, do wychowywania w sprawiedliwo艣ci, aby cz艂owiek Bo偶y by艂 doskona艂y, do wszelkiego dobrego dzie艂a przygotowany” (2Tym.3:16-17).
1252 - With the bull Ad extirpanda Pope Innocent IV approved the use of torture and starvation on those suspected of heresy.18 Inquisitors, usually Dominicans, tortured people by twisting and breaking bones, tearing out fingernails, crushing fingers and heads, blinding them, burning them with red-hot irons.19
1414 - The Council of Constance forbade the laity to consume wine during communion, even though Scripture mandates communion under the two forms of bread and wine - both in remembrance of Christ's pierced body and His shed blood on the cross (Matt.26:27; 1 Cor.11:24-26).
1439 – Wprowadzona przez Grzegorza I nauka o czy艣膰cu (593 rok) wywo艂a艂a wiele kontrowersji, ale dobrze p艂atne odpusty i msze za dusze zmar艂ych okaza艂y si臋 dla Ko艣cio艂a tak intratnym biznesem, 偶e sob贸r we Florencji uchwali艂 dogmat, wed艂ug kt贸rego mo偶na naby膰 zbawienie cierpieniem w czy艣膰cu i ofiarami. W ten spos贸b, ludzkimi uczynkami (odpustami i ofiarami), zakwestionowano doskona艂o艣膰 ofiary Chrystusa, kt贸ra wystarcza, aby zbawi膰 ka偶dego pokutuj膮cego grzesznika (Tyt.2:11; 1Jana 1:9; 2:1-2). Sob贸r watyka艅ski II utrzyma艂 ten dogmat, wyja艣niaj膮c: „Od najwcze艣niejszych czas贸w w Ko艣ciele dobre uczynki ofiarowano Bogu za zbawienie grzesznik贸w”.10 Pismo 艢wi臋te nazywa zbawienie z ludzkich uczynk贸w ” tajemnic膮 bezbo偶no艣ci”, przeciwstawiaj膮c mu „tajemnic臋 pobo偶no艣ci”, a wi臋c Dobr膮 Nowin臋 o zbawieniu dzi臋ki ofierze Jezusa Chrystusa: „艁ask膮 bowiem jeste艣cie zbawieni przez wiar臋. A to pochodzi nie od was, lecz jest darem Boga: nie z uczynk贸w, aby si臋 nikt nie chlubi艂” (Efez. 2:8-9). Kupczenie odpustami praktykowane przez Ko艣ci贸艂 rzymski wywo艂a艂o Reformacj臋 i przyczyni艂o si臋 do powstania ko艣cio艂贸w protestanckich. Trwa ono niestety do dzi艣.
1441- The Council of Florence formally prohibited the observance of Saturday as a holy day.11 Saturday was still celebrated by many Christians in the fifteenth century (as is evident, among others, from the records of the Council of Bergen22), especially by the Waldenses and Anabaptists, and through them by many Christians including in Bohemia, Moravia, Slovakia and Silesia.23
1545 – Sob贸r w Trydencie uzna艂 ludzkie tradycje przyj臋te przez Ko艣ci贸艂 za autorytet w sprawach wiary przynajmniej r贸wny Pismu 艢wi臋temu! Pan Jezus za艣 tak powiedzia艂 o niebiblijnych tradycjach religijnych: „S艂usznie prorok Izajasz powiedzia艂 o was, ob艂udnikach, jak jest napisane: Ten lud czci Mnie wargami, lecz sercem swym jest daleko ode Mnie. Ale czci Mnie na pr贸偶no, ucz膮c zasad podanych przez ludzi. Uchylili艣cie przykazanie Bo偶e, a trzymacie si臋 ludzkiej tradycji” (Mar.7:6-8).
1546 – Sob贸r w Trydencie doda艂 do kanonu Pisma 艢wi臋tego kilka ksi膮g, a mianowicie: Tobiasza, Judyty, 1 i 2 Machabejsk膮, M膮dro艣ci, Syracha, Barucha, modlitw臋 trzech m艂odzie艅c贸w i dwa rozdzia艂y w ksi臋dze Daniela.24 W katolickich wydaniach Biblii nazywa si臋 je „drugokanonicznymi”. Uznanie ich za natchnione jest b艂臋dem, gdy偶 po pierwsze zawieraj膮 b艂臋dy chronologiczne, historyczne i teologiczne, a po drugie, S艂owo Bo偶e przestrzega przed dodawaniem czegokolwiek do swej tre艣ci: „Do s艂贸w Jego nic nie dodawaj, by ci臋 nie skara艂: nie uzna艂 za k艂amc臋” (Prz.30:6). Jezus zapowiedzia艂: „Ja 艣wiadcz臋 ka偶demu, kto s艂ucha s艂贸w proroctwa tej ksi臋gi: je艣liby kto艣 do nich cokolwiek do艂o偶y艂, B贸g mu do艂o偶y plag zapisanych w tej ksi臋dze” (Apok.22:18).
1846 – Papie偶 Grzegorz XVI (1831-46) pot臋pi艂 w encyklice Mirari Vos ide臋 rozdzia艂u ko艣cio艂a od pa艅stwa, wolno艣膰 sumienia nazwa艂 „zgubnym b艂臋dem, kt贸ry przywodzi pa艅stwa do ruiny”,25 a wolno艣膰 prasy „zara藕liwym b艂臋dem”.26 Pius IX (1846-78) powiedzia艂: „Doktryny czy brednie w obronie swob贸d sumienia to absurd i najzara藕liwszy b艂膮d, straszliwa plaga, kt贸rej nale偶y si臋 wystrzega膰 jak ognia.”27 Papie偶 Leon XIII (1878-1903) napisa艂: „Bezprawiem jest domaga膰 si臋, broni膰, czy nadawa膰 ludziom bezwarunkow膮 wolno艣膰 my艣li, mowy, pi贸ra, czy nabo偶e艅stwa.”28
1854 – Pius IX og艂osi艂 dogmat o Niepokalanym Pocz臋ciu Maryi. Nie wszyscy wiedz膮, 偶e nie chodzi w nim wcale o to, 偶e Maryja pocz臋艂a Jezusa jako dziewica, lecz o to, 偶e Maryja urodzi艂a si臋 bez grzechu, a wi臋c tak samo jak Jezus. Nie wszyscy wiedz膮 na czym polega dogmat o Niepokalanym Pocz臋ciu Marii. Ot贸偶 nie chodzi w nim bynajmniej o to, 偶e Maria pocz臋艂a Jezusa, jako dziewica, bo z tym zgadzaj膮 si臋 wszyscy chrze艣cijanie. Dogmat ten g艂osi, 偶e Maria urodzi艂a si臋 bez tzw. grzechu pierworodnego, tak samo jak Jezus, a wi臋c, 偶e matka urodzi艂a Mari臋 w spos贸b nadprzyrodzony. Implikacje tej doktryny s膮 powa偶ne, bo sugeruj膮, 偶e Jezus nie jest jedynym, kt贸ry narodzi艂 niepokalany, jak naucza S艂owo Bo偶e (Rzym.3:23-24). Maryja by艂a wzorem czysto艣ci i pos艂usze艅stwa, ale nie by艂a bez grzechu, gdy偶 wszyscy ludzie rodz膮 si臋 w grzechu (Ps.51:7; Rzym.3:10). Maryja potrzebowa艂a Zbawiciela, dlatego powiedzia艂a: „Raduje si臋 duch m贸j w Bogu, moim Zbawcy” (艁uk.1:47) i z艂o偶y艂a ofiar臋 ustanowion膮 za grzech (Kp艂.12:7-8; 艁uk.2:22-24).
1870 – Pius IX og艂osi艂 dogmat o nieomylno艣ci papieskiej, de facto zr贸wnuj膮c papie偶a z Bogiem, gdy偶 tylko B贸g jest nieomylny. W ten spos贸b papiestwo wype艂ni艂o jeszcze jeden element biblijnego proroctwa zapowiadaj膮cego odst臋pcz膮 moc, kt贸ra mia艂a prze艣ladowa膰 ludzi w 艣redniowieczu wprowadzi膰 zwi膮zek Ko艣cio艂a i pa艅stwa (Dan.8:11), pr贸bowa膰 zmieni膰 przykazania Bo偶e (Dan.7:25), zasi膮艣膰 w Ko艣ciele Bo偶ym (2Tes.2:2-12), odwr贸ci膰 uwag臋 ludzi od ofiary Chrystusa i od Jego po艣rednictwa Chrystusa, a zwr贸ci膰 j膮 na swoje ofiary i na ludzkich po艣rednik贸w (Dan.8:11-12), przypisywa膰 sobie Bo偶e atrybuty, takie jak nieomylno艣膰 czy prawo do odpuszczania ludziom grzech贸w (Mk.2:7). Biblia nazywa t臋 moc „antychrystem”. S艂owo „antychryst” (gr. antichristos) oznacza tego, „kt贸ry stawia siebie w miejscu Chrystusa”. Takie znaczenie ma za艣 oficjalny papieski tytu艂 Vicarius Filii Dei, a wi臋c „ten, kt贸ry stoi w miejscu Chrystusa”. Tytu艂 ten w j臋zyku 艂aci艅skim ma liczb臋 666, za艣 zgodnie z Apokalips膮 liczba imienia Antychrysta mia艂a wynosi膰 666 (Apok.13:18):
V I C A R I U S F I L I I D E I
5 1 100 1 5 1 50 1 1 500 1 = 666
1950 – Pius XII og艂osi艂 dogmat o wniebowzi臋ciu Maryi, wynosz膮c jej kult jako „Or臋downiczki”, cho膰 Pismo 艢wi臋te m贸wi, 偶e „jedynym or臋downikiem mi臋dzy Bogiem i cz艂owiekiem” ma by膰 Jezus Chrystus (1Tym.2:5). Aposto艂 Jan napisa艂: „Je艣liby kto zgrzeszy艂, mamy or臋downika u Ojca, Jezusa Chrystusa, kt贸ry jest sprawiedliwy. On ci jest ub艂aganiem za grzechy nasze” (1Jana 2:1-2). Pan Jezus przestrzega艂 przed innymi po艣rednikami: „Zaprawd臋, zaprawd臋 powiadam wam, kto nie wchodzi przez drzwi do owczarni, lecz w inny spos贸b si臋 tam dostaje, ten jest z艂odziejem i zb贸jc膮… Ja jestem drzwiami dla owiec” (Jan 10:1.7). Watykan od lat czyni przygotowania do kolejnego dogmatu maryjnego, tym razem o wsp贸艂udziale Maryi w odkupieniu ludzko艣ci (艂ac. Coredemptrix), cho膰 Pismo 艢wi臋te m贸wi, 偶e imi臋 Jezusa jest jedynym przez kt贸re ludzie mog膮 by膰 zbawieni (Dz.Ap.4:12). Wiele dogmat贸w maryjnych powsta艂o pod wp艂ywem objawie艅 maryjnych, ale objawienia mog膮 by膰 diabelskim zwiedzeniem, gdy偶 wed艂ug Pisma 艢wi臋tego diabe艂 bez trudu potrafi podrobi膰 posta膰 zmar艂ych, Maryi, anio艂a, a nawet Chrystusa: „I nic dziwnego; wszak i szatan przybiera posta膰 anio艂a 艣wiat艂o艣ci. Nic wi臋c nadzwyczajnego, je艣li i s艂udzy jego przybieraj膮 posta膰 s艂ug sprawiedliwo艣ci” (2Kor.11:14).
Thanks for the dose of interesting knowledge!!! 馃檪
I personally don't care about such stupid actions, I don't know what the said 22 pumps are supposed to do to anyone? I don't know what it's supposed to do to anyone. If it did, I'd pump 200 for you every day 馃槈 Piotr is right, it's better to pray. What bothers me more and I can already see it on my micro scale i.e. on my fey profile is the already mentioned trumpomania. See how the very victory of this guy influences people, especially Christians! I can see it among my friends, Christians, who are actually delighted with him and it scares me! How little it takes to fall away. And this is only the beginning of the SURVIVAL. How many more will fall away and be deceived? Unfortunately, but many. For my part, I thank God for this blog, for the fact that I was able to join it, get to know you, shape my worldview and strengthen my faith in God the Father and His Son Jesus Christ. The times are coming my dears that we will be considered extremists, fundamentalists, etc. Papa Franek has already mentioned Christian extremism 馃檪 Soon they will put us under this category and the blog is probably already spying on us noting our activity.
Hi. It's nice that you can talk to each other on the fly. I unfortunately can't at work, but it's nothing. As far as Tramp is concerned, I guess we cannot count on his Christianity. Today a very interesting article appeared http://wolna-polska.pl/wiadomosci/sanhedryn-prosi-putina-trumpa-o-zbudowanie-iii-swiatyni-jerozolimie-2016-11 It shows that Israel wants Tramp and Putin to contribute to the rebuilding of the temple together. By the way has anyone watched all 36 lectures by Professor Walter Veiht? Could it be that the ADS Church are the closest to the truth.
„Pojawieniu si臋 jego towarzyszy膰 b臋dzie dzia艂anie szatana, !!! z ca艂膮 moc膮 !!!, w艣r贸d znak贸w i fa艂szywych cud贸w” my艣l臋 偶e nic takiego jeszcze nie by艂o, no mo偶e by艂y pruby np fatima albo medjugorie natomiast wszyscy kt贸rzy nie uznali Chrystusa czekaja na swojego mesjasza np: syjonistyczni 偶ydzi i muzu艂manie ten na kt贸rego oni czekaja on b臋dzie antychrystem. Trampek wydaje mi si臋 za cieniutki no chyba ze b臋dzie udawa艂 antychrysta by potem oni mogli objawi膰 swojego mesjasza zamiast Chrystusa na co zreszt膮 nama nazwa antychryst wskazuje. My艣l臋 偶e antek b臋dzie posiada艂 nadprzyrodzone zdolno艣ci czyli t臋 moc od diab艂a, st膮d te cuda i znaki. Ale kto wie ciekwae to jest i wielu chcia艂o by uchyli膰 r膮bka tajemnicy.
Greetings from the Lord God
„Francuscy masoni w konflikcie z kr贸low膮 niebios”!…
Probably need to make more room for allah worshippers... 馃檪 .
Masonic associations remove statues of Mary from France. Court agrees
French Freemasons believe that the Catholic religion is incompatible with the republic and intend to continue removing monuments depicting the Virgin Mary. Their action is supported by the French courts, which agree with them.
The Freemasons demanded the removal of a statue of the Virgin Mary from the French commune of Publier. Some residents were outraged and rejected the demands of Freemasons. The case went to the court which agreed with the Masonic association. According to the verdict, the monument is to be removed. What is interesting, even the mayor, known for his leftist views, was surprised by the court's decision.
- I never thought it would get this far," said Mayor Gaston Lacroix.
The statue was erected in Publier with the permission of the municipality, but the court ruled that it was done illegally because it violated the religious feelings of a group of citizens. In reaching its verdict, the court cited the principle of separation of state and Catholic Church, which was finally established in 1905.
Masonic associations have announced that they will continue to remove statues of Mary from France. They are the ones who challenged the erection of the monument in the municipality. They believe the court's decision is a victory for secularism.
- This is a victory for secularism. Now the mayor must remove the monument. This will be a beautiful example for the youth. We ask ourselves whether the Catholic religion is at all compatible with a republic.
http://pikio.pl/stowarzyszenia-masonskie-usuwaja-z-francji-pomniki-maryi-sad-sie-zgadza/
Nie wiem, jak dla mnie „pochwycenie” , jest to zabranie oblubienicy do siebie. Jezus nas wybra艂, zap艂aci艂 za nas cen臋, poszed艂 do Ojca szykowa膰 mieszkanie, a nast臋pnie przyjdzie niezapowiedziany, by nas zabra膰 – to ma sens, podobnie zar臋czyny i zawieranie ma艂偶e艅stw w tamtych czasach – wszystko si臋 zgadza. Je偶eli pochwycenie by艂oby po wielkim ucisku, to tak jak by Pan pozwoli艂 nas najpierw ubiczowa膰, um臋czy膰, pomordowa膰, a potem wzi膮艂 do siebie… Jako艣 mi to nie gra …
People are already dying and were dying during the Inquisition and Reformation.
They may not all die, but Satan will haunt the apocalypse boy.
Even in this day and age this is evident from the Voice of Persecuted Christians website
Actually, I did not look at it through the prism of the whole world. And that's just the way it is. Just when I think I had some knowledge, it all turns to uncertainty all over again. There is only one thing left: faith, prayer and hope 馃檪 With God Brothers and Sisters.
And it is not there that the rest of the seed of the woman ? I guess the boy that the woman (Israel) produced is the Christ who will graze the nations with a rod of iron. The boy came forth from the people of God and now from the throne of God exercises authority over the whole world.
„I stan膮艂 smok przed niewiast膮, kt贸ra mia艂a porodzi膰, aby, skoro tylko porodzi, po偶re膰 jej dzieci臋. I porodzi艂a syna, ch艂opczyka, kt贸ry rz膮dzi膰 b臋dzie wszystkimi narodami lask膮 偶elazn膮; dzieci臋 jej zosta艂o porwane do Boga i do jego tronu.”
Then when Christ ascends into Heaven Satan and his hordes are cast out to take revenge on those remnant of the Woman that is Christians (spiritual Israel) who believe in Christ.
Very interesting lecture by the way: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DASoBsJtyZ8